/external/tcpdump/ |
TODO | 2 2. review "FILES"
|
/external/webkit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/common/config/ |
committervalidator_unittest.py | 38 expected_messsage = """foo@foo.com does not have review permissions according to http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/common/config/committers.py. 40 - If you do not have review rights please read http://webkit.org/coding/contributing.html for instructions on how to use bugzilla flags. 42 - If you have review rights please correct the error in Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/common/config/committers.py by adding yourself to the file (no review needed). The commit-queue restarts itself every 2 hours. After restart the commit-queue will correctly respect your review rights.""" 43 self.assertEqual(validator._flag_permission_rejection_message("foo@foo.com", "review"), expected_messsage)
|
/external/javassist/ |
regenerate_from_source.sh | 5 # to git giving you a chance to review the changes. Remember that changes in
|
/external/webkit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/tool/steps/ |
closebug.py | 48 if patch.review() == "?" or patch.review() == "+": 49 log("Not closing bug %s as attachment %s has review=%s. Assuming there are more patches to land from this bug." % (patch.bug_id(), patch.id(), patch.review()))
|
options.py | 54 request_commit = make_option("--request-commit", action="store_true", dest="request_commit", default=False, help="Mark the patch as needing auto-commit after review.") 55 review = make_option("--no-review", action="store_false", dest="review", default=True, help="Do not mark the patch for review.") variable in class:Options
|
postdiff.py | 39 Options.review, 48 self._tool.bugs.add_patch_to_bug(state["bug_id"], diff, description, comment_text=comment_text, mark_for_review=self._options.review, mark_for_commit_queue=self._options.request_commit)
|
/development/pdk/docs/source/ |
life-of-a-patch.jd | 4 <p>The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) uses a web-based code review tool
|
index.jd | 28 <p>Code is King. We'd love to review any changes you submit, so please check 31 review them.</p>
|
submit-patches.jd | 5 <br>This page describes how to record changes to the Android files on your local client, upload those changes to the code-review server, and use Gerrit to track changes.<br><h2> 11 contribution and review process, see <a 39 <li><span>Use repo upload to upload changes to the review server</span> 42 You can track your uploaded changes using the Gerrit code-review tool. When it's time to work on the code again, run repo sync, then go back to step 1 above and start another topic branch.<br><br>The steps will not always come in the order shown--for example, you might run git diff at several points in the process.<br><br><h3> 69 Committing changes during code review</h3> 73 <li>See below to upload the changes to Gerrit again for another review cycle.</li> 85 To upload your committed changes to the review server:<br><ol><li>Complete the appropriate <a href="https://review.source.android.com/#settings,new-agreement">Contributor Agreement</a> 87 <li>Select an <a href="https://review.source.android.com/#settings,ssh-keys">SSH Username</a> 88 and upload your <a href="https://review.source.android.com/#settings,ssh-keys">public SSH key</a [all...] |
cla-individual.jd | 4 <div><p><i>Please visit the <a href="https://review.source.android.com/#settings,new-agreement">code review tool</a> 5 to execute the grant online.This page provides the text of the Individual Contributor License Grant for your quick review.</i> 11 <p>Scanned agreements may also be emailed in PDF form to cla-submissions@google.com, sent by facsimile to (650) 887-1625, or <a href="https://review.source.android.com/#settings,new-agreement">signed electronically</a>
|
/development/samples/JetBoy/src/com/example/android/jetboy/ |
Asteroid.java | 17 // FIXME: review and cleanup
|
Explosion.java | 17 // FIXME: review and cleanup
|
/external/android-mock/ |
regenerate_from_source.sh | 5 # to git giving you a chance to review the changes. Remember that changes in
|
/external/webkit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/tool/bot/ |
feeders_unittest.py | 47 - If you have committer rights please correct the error in Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/common/config/committers.py by adding yourself to the file (no review needed). The commit-queue restarts itself every 2 hours. After restart the commit-queue will correctly respect your committer rights.' 74 def __init__(self, patch_id, review): 76 self.review = lambda: review
|
feeders.py | 65 # Filters out patches with r? or r-, only r+ or no review are OK to land. 67 return [patch for patch in patches if patch.review() in [None, '+']]
|
/external/webkit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/tool/commands/ |
upload.py | 75 if patch.review() == "+": 77 what_was_cleared.append("%s's review+" % patch.reviewer().full_name) 79 what_was_cleared.append("review+") 97 name = "clean-review-queue" 101 queue_url = "http://webkit.org/pending-review" 102 # We do this inefficient dance to be more like webkit.org/pending-review 104 # closed bugs, but folks using /pending-review will see them. :( 107 if not patch.review() == "?": 113 bug_closed_explanation = " If you would like this patch reviewed, please attach it to a new bug (or re-open this bug before marking it for review again)." 117 message = "Cleared review? from %sattachment %s so that this bug does not appear in %s.%s" % (attachment_obsolete_modifier, (…) [all...] |
/docs/source.android.com/src/source/ |
index.md | 44 Code is King. We'd love to review any changes you submit, so please check 47 review them.
|
life-of-a-patch.md | 19 The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) uses a web-based code review tool
|
version-control.md | 23 **Repo** is a repository management tool that we built on top of Git. Repo unifies the many Git repositories when necessary, does the uploads to our [revision control system](http://review.source.android.com/), and automates parts of the Android development workflow. Repo is not meant to replace Git, only to make it easier to work with Git in the context of Android. The repo command is an executable Python script that you can put anywhere in your path. In working with the Android source files, you will use Repo for across-network operations. For example, with a single Repo command you can download files from multiple repositories into your local working directory. 25 **Gerrit** is a web-based code review system for projects that use git. Gerrit encourages more centralized use of Git by allowing all authorized users to submit changes, which are automatically merged if they pass code review. In addition, Gerrit makes reviewing easier by displaying changes side by side in-browser and enabling inline comments. 43 1. Use `repo upload` to upload changes to the review server. 138 This will list the changes you have committed and prompt you to select which branches to upload to the review server. If there is only one branch, you will see a simple `y/n` prompt. 172 Deleting a client will *permanently delete* any changes you have not yet uploaded for review.
|
/external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/ |
DTMDOMException.java | 26 * %REVIEW% Several classes were implementing this internally;
|
/external/chromium/net/disk_cache/ |
trace.h | 7 // can review the cache recent behavior should we need it.
|
/ndk/tests/device/test-compiler-bug-1/jni/ |
main.c | 19 * https://review.source.android.com/#change,19474
|
/external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/ref/sax2dtm/ |
SAX2RTFDTM.java | 58 * %REVIEW% In fact, since the differences are so minor, I think it 79 * %REVIEW% I don't think number of NS sets is ever different from number 85 * %REVIEW% I don't think number of NS sets is ever different from number 157 * %REVIEW% Should we continue to report the most recent after 214 * %REVIEW% Y'know, this isn't all that much of a deoptimization. We 238 * %REVIEW% Y'know, this isn't all that much of a deoptimization. We 274 * %REVIEW% I have no idea how to rewind m_elemIndexes. However, 284 // %REVIEW% Can the namespace stack sizes ever differ? If not, save space! 309 * %REVIEW% WARNING: This is the first use of some of the truncation 313 * %REVIEW% Our original design for DTMs permitted them to shar [all...] |
/external/webkit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/common/net/bugzilla/ |
bugzilla_unittest.py | 55 <flag name="review" 76 'review' : '+', 153 <flag name="review" 186 'review': '?', 357 <h3>Flag: review</h3> 370 <td><a href="attachment.cgi?id=40511&action=review"> 378 <td><a href="attachment.cgi?id=40722&action=review"> 386 <td><a href="attachment.cgi?id=40723&action=review"> 438 queries._load_query("request.cgi?action=queue&type=review&group=type")
|
attachment.py | 78 def review(self): member in class:Attachment 79 return self._attachment_dictionary.get("review")
|