Lines Matching refs:ph1
813 "failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: %d, status %d).\n",
842 "failed to process ph1 packet (side: %d, status: %d).\n",
980 plog(LLV_ERROR, LOCATION, iph2->ph1->remote,
988 plog(LLV_ERROR, LOCATION, iph2->ph1->remote,
993 isakmp_info_send_n1(iph2->ph1, error, NULL);
1017 plog(LLV_ERROR, LOCATION, iph2->ph1->remote,
1227 "failed to process ph1 packet (side: %d, status: %d).\n",
1270 /* fixup ph2 ports for this ph1 */
1384 isakmp_info_send_n1(iph2->ph1, error, NULL);
1399 plog(LLV_ERROR, LOCATION, iph2->ph1->remote,
1897 if (iph2->ph1->status >= PHASE1ST_EXPIRED) {
1900 isakmp_pindex(&iph2->ph1->index, iph2->msgid));
1907 isakmp_pindex(&iph2->ph1->index, iph2->msgid));
1913 if (isakmp_send(iph2->ph1, iph2->sendbuf) < 0){
1916 isakmp_pindex(&iph2->ph1->index, iph2->msgid));
1923 isakmp_pindex(&iph2->ph1->index, iph2->msgid));
2318 if (iph2->ph1->status >= PHASE1ST_EXPIRED) {
2319 plog(LLV_ERROR, LOCATION, iph2->ph1->remote,
2379 /* XXX Even if ph1 as responder is there, should we not start
2385 plog(LLV_DEBUG2, LOCATION, NULL, "CHKPH1THERE: got a ph1 handler, setting ports.\n");
2402 plog(LLV_DEBUG2, LOCATION, NULL, "CHKPH1THERE: no established ph1 handler found\n");
2697 return set_isakmp_header (vbuf, iph2->ph1, nptype, ISAKMP_ETYPE_QUICK, iph2->flags, iph2->msgid);
2975 plog(LLV_ERROR, LOCATION, iph2->ph1->remote, "wrong state %u.\n",
3347 * If we have a new ph1, do not purge IPsec-SAs binded
3350 if (iph2->ph1 != NULL && iph2->ph1 != iph1){
