Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in netperf

Lines Matching refs:confidence

1367   /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
1368 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
1369 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
1370 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
1372 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
1765 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
1773 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
1791 /* are for all the confidence stuff. we could make the values */
1813 if (confidence < 0) {
1814 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
1910 /* this stuff needs to be worked-out in the presence of confidence */
2062 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
2063 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
2064 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
2065 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
2067 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
2471 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
2479 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
2497 /* are for all the confidence stuff. we could make the values */
2519 if (confidence < 0) {
2520 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
2616 /* this stuff needs to be worked-out in the presence of confidence */
2795 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
2796 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
2797 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
2798 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
2800 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
3229 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
3237 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
3255 /* are for all the confidence stuff. we could make the values */
3277 if (confidence < 0) {
3278 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
3364 /* this stuff needs to be worked-out in the presence of confidence */
3567 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
3568 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
3569 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
3570 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
3572 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
4052 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
4060 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
4077 /* are for all the confidence stuff. we could make the values */
4099 if (confidence < 0) {
4100 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
4198 /* this stuff needs to be worked-out in the presence of confidence */
5069 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
5070 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
5071 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
5072 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
5074 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
5491 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
5499 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information.
5535 if (confidence < 0) {
5536 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
5663 /* confidence intervals is yet to be determined... raj 11/94 */
5815 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
5816 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
5817 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
5818 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
5820 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
6126 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
6134 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
6171 /* confidence routine */
6187 if (confidence < 0) {
6188 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
6713 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
6714 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
6715 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
6716 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
6718 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
7082 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
7090 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
7127 if (confidence < 0) {
7128 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
7220 /* confidence intervals is yet to be determined... raj 11/94 */
10255 /* confidence interval (I really should have stayed awake during */
10256 /* probstats :). If the user did not request confidence measurement */
10257 /* (no confidence is the default) then we will only go though the */
10258 /* loop once. the confidence stuff originates from the folks at IBM */
10260 while (((confidence < 0) && (confidence_iteration < iteration_max)) ||
10609 /* we were not measuring cpu, for the confidence stuff, we */
10617 /* at this point, we want to calculate the confidence information. */
10653 if (confidence < 0) {
10654 /* we did not hit confidence, but were we asked to look for it? */
10746 /* confidence intervals is yet to be determined... raj 11/94 */