| /external/chromium_org/ipc/ |
| OWNERS | 11 # New IPC message files require a security review to avoid introducing
|
| /frameworks/base/docs/html/distribute/googleplay/edu/ |
| start.jd | 22 <p>To get started, review the sections in this document and learn how to make
107 <p>Before you opt-in, review the Addendum completely and make any necessary
121 made available to educators through Google Play for Education, including review,
159 third-party educator network for review and approval. If the app is already
160 published, it will be submitted for review as soon as you opt-in and save your
169 <h3 id="review">4. Track your review and approval</h3>
174 with a third-party educator network to review and approve apps before making
185 queued for review by our third-party educator network. The review and approva
[all...] |
| /docs/source.android.com/src/accessories/ |
| custom.jd | 43 <li>Review the <a href="{@docRoot}accessories/index.html">AOA protocol</a> specifications to understand
47 <li>Review the ADK 2012 <a href="http://developer.android.com/tools/adk/adk2.html#src-download">firmware source code</a>
51 via USB, review the ADK 2012 Android
69 <li>Review the ADK 2012 <a href="http://developer.android.com/tools/adk/adk2.html#src-download">firmware source code</a>
73 via Bluetooth, review the ADK 2012 Android
|
| audio.jd | 36 <li>Review the <a href="{@docRoot}accessories/aoa2.html">AOA 2.0 protocol</a> specification to understand
38 <li>Review the ADK 2012 <a href="http://developer.android.com/tools/adk/adk2.html#src-download">firmware source code</a>
62 <li>Review the ADK 2012
|
| /docs/source.android.com/src/source/ |
| contributing.jd | 40 <p>Code is King. We'd love to review any changes you submit, so please check
43 review them.</p>
48 <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/">Gerrit server</a>.
|
| developing.jd | 31 <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/">revision control system</a>, and
39 <p><strong>Gerrit</strong> is a web-based code review system for projects that use git. Gerrit encourages more centralized use of Git by allowing all authorized users to submit changes, which are automatically merged if they pass code review. In addition, Gerrit makes reviewing easier by displaying changes side by side in-browser and enabling inline comments. </p>
60 <p>Use <code>repo upload</code> to upload changes to the review server.</p>
127 <p>This will list the changes you have committed and prompt you to select which branches to upload to the review server. If there is only one branch, you will see a simple <code>y/n</code> prompt.</p>
157 <p>Deleting a client will <em>permanently delete</em> any changes you have not yet uploaded for review.</p>
|
| cla-individual.jd | 12 <p><em>Please visit the <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/settings/new-agreement">code review tool</a>
13 to execute the grant online.This page provides the text of the Individual Contributor License Grant for your quick review.</em></p>
26 <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/settings/new-agreement">signed electronically</a>.</p>
|
| /external/chromium_org/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/tool/steps/ |
| postdiff.py | 39 Options.review,
50 self._tool.bugs.add_patch_to_bug(bug_id, diff, description, comment_text=comment_text, mark_for_review=self._options.review, mark_for_commit_queue=self._options.request_commit)
|
| options.py | 53 request_commit = make_option("--request-commit", action="store_true", dest="request_commit", default=False, help="Mark the patch as needing auto-commit after review.")
54 review = make_option("--no-review", action="store_false", dest="review", default=True, help="Do not mark the patch for review.") variable in class:Options
|
| /ndk/docs/tools/ |
| README | 32 r/<number> -> [r/<number>](https://https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/<number>)
36 https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/<number>
|
| ndk-markdown-substitutions.py | 106 # https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/<number>
107 # -> [r/<number>](https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/<number>)
109 r"(^|\s+)(https://android-review\.googlesource\.com/\#/c/([0-9]+))",
111 add_filter_test(r"https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/12345", r"[r/12345](https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/12345)")
121 # -> [r/<number>](https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/<number>)
124 r"\1[\2](https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/\3)")
127 r"[r/12345](https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/12345)")
|
| /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/ |
| DTMDOMException.java | 26 * %REVIEW% Several classes were implementing this internally;
|
| DTMFilter.java | 126 * %REVIEW% Might be safer to start from higher bits and work down,
137 * %REVIEW% Might be safer to start from higher bits and work down,
166 * <p>%REVIEW% Under what circumstances will this be used? The cases
170 * <p>%REVIEW% Should that 0xFFFF have a mnemonic assigned to it?
|
| /external/chromium/net/disk_cache/ |
| trace.h | 7 // can review the cache recent behavior should we need it.
|
| /external/chromium_org/net/disk_cache/ |
| trace.h | 7 // can review the cache recent behavior should we need it.
|
| /external/chromium_org/webkit/ |
| DEPS | 39 # TODO(brettw) - review these; move up if it's ok, or remove the dependency
|
| /external/dexmaker/ |
| bug-8297640.patch | 7 + // try dalvikvm, with change https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/52331/
|
| /external/littlemock/ |
| bug-8297640.patch | 9 + // try dalvikvm, with change https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/52331/
|
| /ndk/sources/third_party/googletest/patches.ndk/ |
| 0003-Allow-clone-usage-on-X86.patch | 6 Since https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/61106/,
|
| /ndk/tests/device/test-compiler-bug-1/jni/ |
| main.c | 19 * https://review.source.android.com/#change,19474
|
| /sdk/eclipse/plugins/com.android.ide.eclipse.adt/src/com/android/ide/eclipse/adt/internal/wizards/templates/ |
| TemplatePreviewPage.java | 32 setDescription("Optionally review pending changes");
|
| /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/ref/sax2dtm/ |
| SAX2RTFDTM.java | 58 * %REVIEW% In fact, since the differences are so minor, I think it
79 * %REVIEW% I don't think number of NS sets is ever different from number
85 * %REVIEW% I don't think number of NS sets is ever different from number
157 * %REVIEW% Should we continue to report the most recent after
214 * %REVIEW% Y'know, this isn't all that much of a deoptimization. We
238 * %REVIEW% Y'know, this isn't all that much of a deoptimization. We
274 * %REVIEW% I have no idea how to rewind m_elemIndexes. However,
284 // %REVIEW% Can the namespace stack sizes ever differ? If not, save space!
309 * %REVIEW% WARNING: This is the first use of some of the truncation
313 * %REVIEW% Our original design for DTMs permitted them to shar
[all...] |
| /external/llvm/docs/ |
| DeveloperPolicy.rst | 77 When making a patch for review, the goal is to make it as easy for the reviewer
110 .. _code review:
115 LLVM has a code review policy. Code review is one way to increase the quality of
128 all necessary review-related changes.
130 #. Code review can be an iterative process, which continues until the patch is
134 reviewees. If someone is kind enough to review your code, you should return the
135 favor for someone else. Note that anyone is welcome to review and give feedback
138 There is a web based code review tool that can optionally be used
146 of code review plus post-commit review for trusted maintainers. Having both i
[all...] |
| /ndk/tests/build/warn-noabi/ |
| build.sh | 2 # See https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/42274/
|
| /ndk/tests/device/issue42891-boost-1_52/jni/boost/boost/numeric/conversion/ |
| cast.hpp | 18 // 23 Jan 2004 Inital add to cvs (post review)s
|
