HomeSort by relevance Sort by last modified time
    Searched full:review (Results 76 - 100 of 669) sorted by null

1 2 34 5 6 7 8 91011>>

  /docs/source.android.com/src/source/
roles.jd 41 follow the same code review process, and are subject
59 project. In the code-review process, an approver decides whether to include or
86 <p>Review changes in a timely manner and make best efforts to communicate
submit-patches.jd 28 reviewing and tracking changes with <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/">Gerrit</a>.</p>
57 <p>Sign in on the <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/">AOSP Gerrit Server</a>.</p>
101 <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/">Gerrit</a>. Visit this link to view
102 your patch on the review server, add comments, or request specific reviewers
124 <p>After a submission makes it through the review and verification process, Gerrit automatically merges the change into the public repository. Other users will be able to run <code>repo sync</code> to pull the update into their local client.</p>
167 change number as listed in <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/">Gerrit</a>. For more information,
  /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xalan/transformer/
ClonerToResultTree.java 103 // // %REVIEW% Is the node name the same as the "target"?
181 // %REVIEW% Normally, these should have been handled with element.
196 // %REVIEW% Is the node name the same as the "target"?
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/WebKit/Tools/GardeningServer/scripts/
svn-log_unittests.js 48 '&gt; Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13529033\n' +
51 'Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13462004</msg>\n' +
77 'Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13725004</msg>\n' +
model_unittests.js 48 '&gt; Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13529033\n' +
51 'Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13462004</msg>\n' +
77 'Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13725004</msg>\n' +
  /frameworks/base/docs/html/tools/help/
gltracer.jd 92 <p>After you have generated a trace, you can load it for review and analysis.</p>
94 <p>To review a captured trace:</p>
101 <li>After loading a trace, select a frame and review the OpenGL ES calls. Drawing commands are
  /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/ref/
CoroutineManager.java 130 * %REVIEW% It's been proposed that we be able to pass types of data
172 * <p>%REVIEW% We could use an object as the identifier. Not sure
223 * a registered member of this group. %REVIEW% whether this is the
259 * registered member of this group. %REVIEW% whether this is the best choice.
291 // %REVIEW% Should this throw/return something more useful?
314 m_nextCoroutine=NOBODY; // %REVIEW%
328 * registered member of this group. %REVIEW% whether this is the best choice.
DTMAxisIteratorBase.java 131 // %REVIEW% Should position also be saved by setMark()?
199 * %REVIEW% If we're calling it purely for side effects, should we really
222 * %REVIEW% Document when this would be used?
DTMManagerDefault.java 59 * %REVIEW% There is currently a reentrancy issue, since the finalizer
147 // TODO: %REVIEW% Not really the right error message.
155 // %REVIEW%
163 // %REVIEW% Should throw a more diagnostic error if we go over the max...
291 // %REVIEW% Is there a better way to send a warning?
305 // %REVIEW% This is a sloppy way to request this mode;
336 incremental = true; // No matter what. %REVIEW%
510 // %REVIEW% We could search for the one which contains this
516 // TODO: %REVIEW% If overflow addressing, we may recheck a DTM
535 // %REVIEW% Is this really desirable, or should we return nul
    [all...]
IncrementalSAXSource_Filter.java 51 * <p>%REVIEW%: This filter is not currenly intended to be reusable
79 private ContentHandler clientContentHandler=null; // %REVIEW% support multiple?
80 private LexicalHandler clientLexicalHandler=null; // %REVIEW% support multiple?
81 private DTDHandler clientDTDHandler=null; // %REVIEW% support multiple?
82 private ErrorHandler clientErrorHandler=null; // %REVIEW% support multiple?
214 // %REVIEW% Glenn suggests that pausing after endElement, endDocument,
351 // %REVIEW% These do NOT currently affect the eventcounter; I'm asserting
424 // %REVIEW% Current solution: In filtering mode, it is REQUIRED that
703 * malfunctioned. %REVIEW% We _could_ actually throw the exception, but
  /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/ref/dom2dtm/
DOM2DTM.java 85 * %REVIEW%: 'may not be the same as m_context if "//foo" pattern.'
135 // %REVIEW% Move this logic into addNode and recurse? Cleaner!
139 // I'm just hoping nobody is ever quite that foolish... %REVIEW%)
203 // %REVIEW% Wrong error message, but I've been told we're trying
205 // %REVIEW% Should this be a Fatal Error?
219 // %REVIEW% The Namespace Spec currently says that Namespaces are
337 // %REVIEW% Is this local copy Really Useful from a performance
351 // %REVIEW% There's probably a more elegant way to skip
388 // %REVIEW% There's probably a more elegant way to
438 // %REVIEW% Should we let this out the door and just suppress it
    [all...]
  /cts/suite/audio_quality/test_description/review/
review_dut_recording_spectrum.xml 18 <case name="review_dut_recording_spectrum" version="1.0" description="Review">
  /development/samples/training/device-management-policy/res/values/
strings.xml 36 <string name="view_policy_instruction">Review device administration policy:</string>
  /docs/source.android.com/src/devices/tech/datausage/
tags-explained.jd 44 <p>The qtaguid module has been implemented on <a href="https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/q/project:kernel/common+branch:android-3.0,n,z">kernel/common branch of
  /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xml/dtm/
DTM.java 89 // %REVIEW% Should we actually define these as initialized to,
175 * %REVIEW% Do we really expect to set features on DTMs?
227 * <p> %REVIEW% This is obviously useful at the DOM layer, where it
475 * %REVIEW% Document when empty string is possible...
506 * <p> %REVIEW% Are you sure you want "" for no prefix? </p>
537 * <p>%REVIEW% Generally, returning short is false economy. Return int?</p>
668 * <p>%REVIEW% Presumably IDs are still scoped to a single document,
690 * %REVIEW% Resolve Public Identifiers... or consider changing function name.
698 * %REVIEW% Consider resolving Relative URIs.
732 * %REVIEW% Make sure this does the right thing with attribute nodes!!
    [all...]
  /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xpath/functions/
FuncDoclocation.java 55 // %REVIEW%
  /external/apache-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/xpath/objects/
XNull.java 105 // %REVIEW%
  /external/chromium/chrome/browser/metrics/
user_metrics.h 41 // out for review to be updated.
  /external/chromium_org/chrome/
OWNERS 17 # structural changes, please get a review from a reviewer in this file.
  /external/chromium_org/chrome/common/
OWNERS 12 # Changes to IPC messages require a security review to avoid introducing
  /external/chromium_org/content/public/browser/
user_metrics.h 42 // out for review to be updated.
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/
run-bindings-tests 29 # patch. This makes it easier to track and review changes in generated code.
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/sqlite/
fts3.patch 45 + /* Disable fts4 pending review. */
  /external/grub/netboot/
tulip.txt 46 know how things go. I also would appreciate code review by people who
  /external/webp/
README.android 1 URL: http://review.webmproject.org/gitweb?p=libwebp.git

Completed in 412 milliseconds

1 2 34 5 6 7 8 91011>>