/ndk/tests/device/test-stlport_shared-exception/jni/ |
gcsec1.cpp | 5 /* { dg-require-gc-sections "" } */
|
weak1.cpp | 3 // { dg-require-weak-override "" }
|
/ndk/tests/device/test-stlport_static-exception/jni/ |
gcsec1.cpp | 5 /* { dg-require-gc-sections "" } */
|
weak1.cpp | 3 // { dg-require-weak-override "" }
|
/packages/apps/Dialer/ |
proguard.flags | 1 # Xml files containing onClick (menus and layouts) require that proguard not
|
/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/host/i686-linux-glibc2.7-4.4.3/i686-linux/include/c++/4.4.3/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 164 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 172 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 180 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 187 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 188 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 192 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 193 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 204 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 228 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 314 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/host/i686-linux-glibc2.7-4.6/i686-linux/include/c++/4.6.x-google/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 167 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 175 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 183 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 190 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 191 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 195 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 196 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 207 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 231 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 317 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/host/x86_64-linux-glibc2.7-4.6/x86_64-linux/include/c++/4.6.x-google/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 167 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 175 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 183 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 190 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 191 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 195 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 196 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 207 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 231 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 317 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/5/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 164 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 172 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 180 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 187 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 188 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 192 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 193 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 204 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 228 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 314 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/6/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 164 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 172 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 180 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 187 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 188 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 192 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 193 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 204 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 228 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 314 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/7/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 164 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 172 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 180 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 187 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 188 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 192 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 193 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 204 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 228 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 314 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/8/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.4.3/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 164 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 172 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 180 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 187 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 188 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 192 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 193 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 204 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 228 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 314 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/8/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.6/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 167 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 175 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 183 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 190 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 191 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 195 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 196 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 207 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 231 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 317 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/8/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.7/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 167 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 175 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 183 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 190 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 191 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 195 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 196 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 207 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 231 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 317 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/9/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.6/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 167 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 175 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 183 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 190 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 191 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 195 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 196 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 207 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 231 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 317 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/9/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.7/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 167 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 175 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 183 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 190 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 191 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 195 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 196 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 207 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 231 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 317 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/prebuilts/ndk/9/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.8/include/bits/ |
boost_concept_check.h | 166 _Tp __a _IsUnused; // require default constructor 174 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 182 // functions? present way would require a default ctor, i think... 189 _Tp __a(__b); // require copy constructor 190 _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require address of operator 194 _Tp __c _IsUnused(__a); // require const copy constructor 195 const _Tp* __ptr _IsUnused = &__a; // require const address of operator 206 __a = __a; // require assignment operator 230 // 1) require the return type to be exactly bool 316 const _Return& __r _IsUnused = __f();// require operator() member functio [all...] |
/sdk/eclipse/plugins/com.android.ide.eclipse.gldebugger.tests/META-INF/ |
MANIFEST.MF | 7 Require-Bundle: org.junit4;bundle-version="4.5.0";resolution:=optional,
|
/sdk/eclipse/plugins/com.android.ide.eclipse.tests/META-INF/ |
MANIFEST.MF | 8 Require-Bundle: org.junit
|
/external/chromium-trace/trace-viewer/third_party/closure_linter/closure_linter/ |
closurizednamespacesinfo_test.py | 151 'goog.require(\'package.Foo\');', 163 'goog.require(\'package.Foo.methodName\');', 170 'Should require the package, not the method specifically.') 174 input_lines = ['goog.require(\'package.Foo\');'] 183 input_lines = ['goog.require(\'notclosurized.Foo\');'] 193 'goog.require(\'package.Foo.Enum\');', 205 'goog.require(\'package.Foo.CONSTANT\');', 217 'goog.require(\'package.subpackage.CONSTANT\');', 229 'goog.require(\'package.subpackage.method\');', 240 input_lines = ['goog.require(\'goog.testing.jsunit\');' [all...] |
/external/chromium_org/third_party/closure_linter/closure_linter/ |
closurizednamespacesinfo_test.py | 151 'goog.require(\'package.Foo\');', 163 'goog.require(\'package.Foo.methodName\');', 170 'Should require the package, not the method specifically.') 174 input_lines = ['goog.require(\'package.Foo\');'] 183 input_lines = ['goog.require(\'notclosurized.Foo\');'] 193 'goog.require(\'package.Foo.Enum\');', 205 'goog.require(\'package.Foo.CONSTANT\');', 217 'goog.require(\'package.subpackage.CONSTANT\');', 229 'goog.require(\'package.subpackage.method\');', 240 input_lines = ['goog.require(\'goog.testing.jsunit\');' [all...] |
/external/guava/guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/testers/ |
ListSubListTester.java | 88 @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX) 89 @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO) 98 @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX) 105 @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_SET) 106 @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO) 115 @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_SET) 116 @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO) 125 @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX) 126 @CollectionSize.Require(absent = {ZERO, ONE}) 135 @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX [all...] |
/external/nist-sip/java/gov/nist/javax/sip/parser/ |
RequireParser.java | 33 * Parser for Require header. 48 * @param require the header to parse 50 public RequireParser(String require) { 51 super(require); 73 headerName(TokenTypes.REQUIRE); 76 Require r = new Require(); 77 r.setHeaderName(SIPHeaderNames.REQUIRE); 91 r = new Require(); 114 "Require: 100rel \n" [all...] |
/development/samples/training/network-usage/src/com/example/android/networkusage/ |
StackOverflowXmlParser.java | 52 parser.require(XmlPullParser.START_TAG, ns, "feed"); 86 parser.require(XmlPullParser.START_TAG, ns, "entry"); 110 parser.require(XmlPullParser.START_TAG, ns, "title"); 112 parser.require(XmlPullParser.END_TAG, ns, "title"); 119 parser.require(XmlPullParser.START_TAG, ns, "link"); 128 parser.require(XmlPullParser.END_TAG, ns, "link"); 134 parser.require(XmlPullParser.START_TAG, ns, "summary"); 136 parser.require(XmlPullParser.END_TAG, ns, "summary");
|
/external/chromium/chrome/browser/extensions/ |
permissions_apitest.cc | 19 // Since the experimental APIs require a flag, this will fail even though 34 // function that will not be graduating soon, and does not require a
|