Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in Sema

Lines Matching refs:Specifier

588   // template has a constexpr specifier then all its declarations shall
589 // contain the constexpr specifier.
1350 /// \brief Check the validity of a C++ base class specifier.
1428 // The class-name in a base-specifier shall not be an incompletely
1457 // If a class is marked final and it appears as a base-type-specifier in
1471 // Create the base specifier.
1477 /// ActOnBaseSpecifier - Parsed a base specifier. A base specifier is
1478 /// one entry in the base class list of a class specifier, for
1564 // Delete the duplicate base class specifier; we're going to
1662 // FIXME: It would be better if CXXBasePath had the base specifier for
1809 /// ActOnAccessSpecifier - Parsed an access specifier followed by a colon.
1814 assert(Access != AS_none && "Invalid kind for syntactic access specifier!");
1881 // If a virtual function is marked with the virt-specifier override and
1925 /// declarator is parsed. 'AS' is the access specifier, 'BW' specifies the
1995 // duration (auto, register) or with the extern storage-class-specifier.
1996 // C++ 7.1.1p8: The mutable specifier can be applied only to names of class
2094 // The user provided a superfluous scope specifier inside a class
2651 // When the scope specifier can refer to a member of an unknown
3655 // FIXME: Provide a fixit to remove the base specifier. This requires
3656 // tracking the location of the associated comma for a base specifier.
4588 // C++11 [dcl.constexpr]p8: A constexpr specifier for a non-static member
5921 static bool FindHiddenVirtualMethod(const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier,
5924 RecordDecl *BaseRecord = Specifier->getType()->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
7473 /// Find the base specifier for a base class with the given type.
7522 NestedNameSpecifier *Specifier =
7526 if (!Specifier->getAsType() ||
7527 !Ctx.hasSameType(QualType(Specifier->getAsType(), 0), FoundType))
7936 // nested-name-specifier does not refer to a base class, which is
7945 // Ideally this would point at the last name in the specifier,
7960 // nested-name-specifier shall name a base class of the class
9282 // Create the nested-name-specifier that will be used to qualify the
9636 // order of their declaration in the base-specifier-list, and then the
10042 // base-specifier-list, and then the immediate non-static data members of X
11545 // An elaborated-type-specifier shall be used in a friend declaration
11548 // * The class-key of the elaborated-type-specifier is required.
11591 // friend elaborated-type-specifier ;
11592 // friend simple-type-specifier ;
11593 // friend typename-specifier ;
11598 // If the type specifier in a friend declaration designates a (possibly
11606 /// Handle a friend tag declaration where the scope specifier was
11733 /// declaring a class. So, for example, the elaborated type specifier
11751 // Try to convert the decl specifier to a type. This works for
11875 // - There's no scope specifier and we're in a local class. Only look
11919 // - There's no scope specifier, in which case we just go to the
11926 // elaborated-type-specifier, the lookup to determine whether
11966 // - There's a non-dependent scope specifier, in which case we
12018 // - There's a scope specifier that does not match any template
12021 // - There's a scope specifier that does match some template
12065 // If we performed typo correction, we might have added a scope specifier
12441 // We will always have a nested name specifier here, but this declaration
12442 // might not be out of line if the specifier names the current namespace:
12475 // The type-specifier-seq shall not contain typedef and shall not declare a