HomeSort by relevance Sort by last modified time
    Searched refs:BPF_TEST (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by null

  /external/chromium_org/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/
bpf_tests.h 42 // This form of BPF_TEST is a little verbose and should be reserved for complex
68 // This form of BPF_TEST is now discouraged (but still allowed) in favor of
71 // BPF_TEST() takes a C++ data type as an fourth parameter. A variable
76 // they want to communicate data between the BPF_TEST() and a Trap()
80 #define BPF_TEST(test_case_name, test_name, policy, aux) \
83 // A BPF_DEATH_TEST is just the same as a BPF_TEST, but it assumes that the
bpf_tests_unittest.cc 51 BPF_TEST(BPFTest,
syscall_unittest.cc 126 BPF_TEST(Syscall,
  /external/chromium_org/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/
bpf_dsl_more_unittest.cc 69 // BPF_TEST() is guaranteed to turn messages back on, after the policy
76 // we make it a TEST() instead of a BPF_TEST().
97 // BPF_TEST does a lot of the boiler-plate code around setting up a
241 BPF_TEST(SandboxBPF,
549 BPF_TEST(SandboxBPF, GreyListedPolicy, GreyListedPolicy, int /* (*BPF_AUX) */) {
839 // code in its constructor, which is the only way to do so in a BPF_TEST.
840 BPF_TEST(SandboxBPF,
    [all...]

Completed in 63 milliseconds