HomeSort by relevance Sort by last modified time
    Searched refs:pclmulqdq (Results 1 - 17 of 17) sorted by null

  /external/chromium_org/third_party/yasm/source/patched-yasm/modules/arch/x86/tests/
clmul.asm 3 pclmulqdq xmm1, xmm2, 5 label
4 pclmulqdq xmm1, [rax], byte 5 label
5 pclmulqdq xmm1, dqword [rax], 5 label
aes.asm 60 pclmulqdq xmm1, xmm2, 5 label
61 pclmulqdq xmm1, [rax], byte 5 label
62 pclmulqdq xmm1, dqword [rax], 5 label
64 ; pclmulqdq variants
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/boringssl/src/crypto/modes/asm/
ghash-x86_64.pl 36 # Add PCLMULQDQ version performing at 2.02 cycles per processed byte.
50 # consists of 3 independent pclmulqdq instructions, Karatsuba post-
52 # multiplication operations, triplets of independent pclmulqdq's. As
53 # issue rate for pclmulqdq is limited, it makes lesser sense to
59 # longer. A CPU with higher pclmulqdq issue rate would also benefit
408 # PCLMULQDQ version.
435 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$Hkey,$Xi #######
436 pclmulqdq \$0x11,$Hkey,$Xhi #######
437 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$HK,$T1 #######
588 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$Xi,$T1 # ?(0xE1<<1
    [all...]
ghash-x86.pl 50 # Add PCLMULQDQ version performing at 2.10 cycles per processed byte.
51 # The question is how close is it to theoretical limit? The pclmulqdq
111 # on same XMM register, PCLMULQDQ subroutine was measured to process
829 # PCLMULQDQ version.
853 &pclmulqdq ($Xi,$Hkey,0x00); #######
854 &pclmulqdq ($Xhi,$Hkey,0x11); #######
855 &pclmulqdq ($T1,$HK,0x00); #######
876 &pclmulqdq ($Xi,$Hkey,0x00); #######
877 &pclmulqdq ($Xhi,$Hkey,0x11); #######
882 &pclmulqdq ($T2,$T3,0x00); ######
    [all...]
  /external/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/
x86_64-gf2m.pl 15 # for any x86_64 CPU and PCLMULQDQ one suitable for Westmere and
18 # [not very impressive], while PCLMULQDQ - whole 85%-160% better on
187 pclmulqdq \$0,%xmm1,%xmm0 # a1·b1
190 pclmulqdq \$0,%xmm3,%xmm2 # a0·b0
191 pclmulqdq \$0,%xmm5,%xmm4 # (a0+a1)·(b0+b1)
x86-gf2m.pl 16 # and PCLMULQDQ suitable for Westmere and later. Improvement varies
26 # Westmere 53%-121%(PCLMULQDQ)/20%-32%(MMX)
27 # Sandy Bridge 72%-127%(PCLMULQDQ)/27%-23%(MMX)
211 &test ("edx",1<<1); # check PCLMULQDQ bit
216 &pclmulqdq ("xmm0","xmm0",1);
  /external/openssl/crypto/modes/asm/
ghash-x86_64.pl 34 # Add PCLMULQDQ version performing at 2.02 cycles per processed byte.
349 # PCLMULQDQ version.
368 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$Hkey,$Xi #######
369 pclmulqdq \$0x11,$Hkey,$Xhi #######
370 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$T2,$T1 #######
553 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$Hkey,$Xn #######
561 pclmulqdq \$0x11,$Hkey,$Xhn #######
571 pclmulqdq \$0x00,$T2n,$T1n #######
ghash-x86.pl 48 # Add PCLMULQDQ version performing at 2.10 cycles per processed byte.
49 # The question is how close is it to theoretical limit? The pclmulqdq
109 # on same XMM register, PCLMULQDQ subroutine was measured to process
817 # PCLMULQDQ version.
840 &pclmulqdq ($Xi,$Hkey,0x00); #######
841 &pclmulqdq ($Xhi,$Hkey,0x11); #######
842 &pclmulqdq ($T1,$T2,0x00); #######
863 &pclmulqdq ($Xi,$Hkey,0x00); #######
864 &pclmulqdq ($Xhi,$Hkey,0x11); #######
869 &pclmulqdq ($T2,$T3,0x00); ######
    [all...]
  /external/openssl/crypto/perlasm/
x86asm.pl 118 sub ::pclmulqdq
123 { &::generic("pclmulqdq",@_); }
x86_64-xlate.pl 749 my $pclmulqdq = sub {
    [all...]
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/boringssl/src/crypto/perlasm/
x86asm.pl 118 sub ::pclmulqdq
123 { &::generic("pclmulqdq",@_); }
x86_64-xlate.pl 766 my $pclmulqdq = sub {
    [all...]
  /external/llvm/test/MC/X86/
x86-64.s 1231 // CHECK: pclmulqdq $17, %xmm0, %xmm1
1235 // CHECK: pclmulqdq $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
1237 pclmulqdq $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 label
1239 // CHECK: pclmulqdq $16, (%rdi), %xmm1
1243 // CHECK: pclmulqdq $0, (%rdi), %xmm1
1245 pclmulqdq $0, (%rdi), %xmm1 label
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/yasm/source/patched-yasm/modules/arch/x86/
x86cpu.gperf 371 pclmulqdq, x86_cpu_set, CPU_CLMUL
  /external/qemu/target-i386/
ops_sse_header.h 347 DEF_HELPER_4(glue(pclmulqdq, SUFFIX), void, env, Reg, Reg, i32)
  /external/chromium_org/third_party/yasm/source/patched-yasm/
x86insn_nasm.gperf 483 pclmulqdq, pclmulqdq_insn, 2, SUF_Z, 0x3A, 0x44, 0, 0, CPU_AVX, 0, 0
    [all...]
x86insn_gas.gperf     [all...]

Completed in 1893 milliseconds