Lines Matching refs:zf
151 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
159 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)res == 0) << 6; \
163 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
172 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
180 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)res == 0) << 6; \
184 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
193 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
205 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)res == 0) << 6; \
209 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
218 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
230 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)res == 0) << 6; \
234 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
243 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
247 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)CC_DEP1 == 0) << 6; \
250 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
259 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
267 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)res == 0) << 6; \
270 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
279 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
287 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)res == 0) << 6; \
291 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
300 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
304 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)CC_DEP1 == 0) << 6; \
309 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
318 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
322 zf = ((DATA_UTYPE)CC_DEP1 == 0) << 6; \
327 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
371 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
384 zf = (lo == 0) << 6; \
387 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
397 { UInt cf, pf, af, zf, sf, of; \
410 zf = (lo == 0) << 6; \
413 return cf | pf | af | zf | sf | of; \
647 UInt of,sf,zf,cf,pf;
664 case X86CondZ: /* ZF == 1 */
665 zf = eflags >> X86G_CC_SHIFT_Z;
666 return 1 & (inv ^ zf);
675 case X86CondBE: /* (CF or ZF) == 1 */
677 zf = eflags >> X86G_CC_SHIFT_Z;
678 return 1 & (inv ^ (cf | zf));
699 case X86CondLE: /* ((SF xor OF) or ZF) == 1 */
702 zf = eflags >> X86G_CC_SHIFT_Z;
703 return 1 & (inv ^ ((sf ^ of) | zf));
995 This is pretty subtle. LOGIC sets SF and ZF according to the
996 result and makes OF be zero. LE computes (SZ ^ OF) | ZF, but
997 OF is zero, so this reduces to SZ | ZF -- which will be 1 iff
1005 LOGIC sets ZF according to the result and makes CF be zero.
1006 BE computes (CF | ZF), but CF is zero, so this reduces ZF
