Lines Matching refs:Spec
153 // If we have an MSAny spec already, don't bother.
165 // If we have a throw-all spec at this point, ignore the function.
197 // noexcept(false) -> no spec on the new function
224 // C++0x [except.spec]p14:
573 // C++ [temp.expr.spec]p21:
642 // C++11 [dcl.fcn.spec]p4:
4731 if (auto *Spec = dyn_cast<ClassTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl>(Class)) {
4733 getDLLAttr(Spec->getSpecializedTemplate()->getTemplatedDecl())) {
5233 // This affects whether we implicitly add an exception spec and constexpr.
5436 for (auto &Spec : Specs)
5437 CheckExplicitlyDefaultedMemberExceptionSpec(Spec.first, Spec.second);
8250 "Using decl naming constructor doesn't have type in scope spec.");
8731 // C++ [except.spec]p14:
8791 // C++ [except.spec]p14:
9318 // C++ [except.spec]p14:
9536 // spec doesn't allow exceptions, we should emit a warning, because this
9979 // C++ [except.spec]p14:
10372 // C++0x [except.spec]p14:
10812 // C++ [except.spec]p14:
10974 // C++ [except.spec]p14:
12579 // EDG do, and it seems like a reasonable intent, but the spec
13654 // Check that the type is valid for an exception spec, and
