Cross Reference: /external/clang/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp

Lines Matching full:specifier
92       [this, BaseDecl](const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, CXXBasePath &Path) {
93         return FindBaseClass(Specifier, Path, BaseDecl);
113       [this, BaseDecl](const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, CXXBasePath &Path) {
114         return FindVirtualBaseClass(Specifier, Path, BaseDecl);
219       // Add this base specifier to the current path.
284     // Pop this base specifier off the current path (if we're
356 bool CXXRecordDecl::FindBaseClass(const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, 
361   return Specifier->getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl()
365 bool CXXRecordDecl::FindVirtualBaseClass(const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, 
370   return Specifier->isVirtual() &&
371          Specifier->getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl()
375 bool CXXRecordDecl::FindTagMember(const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, 
379     Specifier->getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
391 bool CXXRecordDecl::FindOrdinaryMember(const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, 
395     Specifier->getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
409 FindNestedNameSpecifierMember(const CXXBaseSpecifier *Specifier, 
413     Specifier->getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
418     // FIXME: Refactor the "is it a nested-name-specifier?" check
OpenGrok
