Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in functional

Lines Matching refs:EndMessage

1153 				log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: no matching " << supersetName << " point found for " << subsetName << " point " << subPt << TestLog::EndMessage;
1155 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: More errors follow" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1180 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: in the following reference visualization, points that are missing in result point set are blue (if any)" << TestLog::EndMessage
1182 << TestLog::Message << "Note: in the following result visualization, points that are missing in reference point set are red (if any)" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1241 << " and should equal the number of segments, i.e. number of vertices minus 1" << TestLog::EndMessage
1242 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1248 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: smallest coordinate should be 0.0 and biggest should be 1.0" << TestLog::EndMessage
1249 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1280 << segmentsA[0].length << " or " << segmentsB[0].length << TestLog::EndMessage
1281 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1291 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: clamped and final tessellation level are equal, but not all segments are of equal length." << TestLog::EndMessage
1292 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1306 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: when dividing the segments to 2 groups by length, neither of the two groups has exactly 2 or 0 segments in it" << TestLog::EndMessage
1307 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1324 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: the two additional segments are longer than the other segments" << TestLog::EndMessage
1325 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1341 << " (note: the two indexes should sum to " << (int)segments.size()-1 << ", i.e. numberOfSegments-1)" << TestLog::EndMessage
1342 << TestLog::Message << failNote << TestLog::EndMessage;
1407 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: additional segments not located identically for two edges with identical clamped tessellation levels" << TestLog::EndMessage
1411 << curData.additionalSegmentLocation << " and " << prevData.additionalSegmentLocation << ", respectively" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1440 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: additional segment length isn't monotonically decreasing with the fraction <n> - <f>, among edges with same final tessellation level" << TestLog::EndMessage
1441 << TestLog::Message << "Note: <f> stands for the clamped tessellation level and <n> for the final (rounded and clamped) tessellation level" << TestLog::EndMessage
1445 << ", but resulted in segment lengths " << prevData.additionalSegmentLength << " and " << curData.additionalSegmentLength << TestLog::EndMessage;
1505 << (ignoredTriangleDescription == DE_NULL ? "" : string() + ", and " + ignoredTriangleDescription) << ")" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1508 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: e.g. triangle " << *aIt << " exists for first case but not for second" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1510 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: e.g. triangle " << *bIt << " exists for second case but not for first" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1807 << TestLog::EndMessage;
1810 EndMessage;
1812 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: the 'precise' qualifier is used to avoid cracks between primitives" << TestLog::EndMessage;
1830 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: there seem to be cracks in the rendered result" << TestLog::EndMessage
1831 << TestLog::Message << "Note: pixel with zero r, g and b channels found at " << tcu::IVec2(x, y) << TestLog::EndMessage;
1838 log << TestLog::Message << "Success: there seem to be no cracks in the rendered result" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2043 log << TestLog::Message << "Tessellation levels: " << tessellationLevelsString(innerLevels, outerLevels, m_primitiveType) << TestLog::EndMessage;
2061 << " (logging further info anyway)" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2065 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: GL reported GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_PRIMITIVES_WRITTEN to be " << tfResult.numPrimitives << TestLog::EndMessage;
2068 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: in the following visualization(s), the u=1, v=1, w=1 corners are at the right, top, and left corners, respectively" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2070 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: in the following visualization(s), u and v coordinate go left-to-right and bottom-to-top, respectively" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2080 log << TestLog::Message << "All OK" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2375 log << TestLog::Message << "Tessellation levels: " << tessellationLevelsString(&innerLevels[0], &outerLevels[0], m_primitiveType) << TestLog::EndMessage;
2775 log << TestLog::Message << "Face culling enabled" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2779 log << TestLog::Message << "Setting glFrontFace(" << (frontFaceWinding == WINDING_CW ? "GL_CW" : "GL_CCW") << ")" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2806 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: got " << numWhitePixels << " white and " << numRedPixels << " red pixels" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2810 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: Got " << totalNumPixels - numWhitePixels - numRedPixels << " other than white or red pixels (maximum tolerance " << badPixelTolerance << ")" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2821 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: wrong number of white pixels; expected approximately " << totalNumPixels/2 << TestLog::EndMessage;
2830 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: expected only white pixels (full-viewport quad)" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2842 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: expected only red pixels (everything culled)" << TestLog::EndMessage;
2974 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: input patch size is " << m_inputPatchSize << ", output patch size is " << m_outputPatchSize << TestLog::EndMessage;
3228 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: input patch size is " << INPUT_PATCH_SIZE << ", output patch size is " << OUTPUT_PATCH_SIZE << TestLog::EndMessage;
3282 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: expected all white pixels" << TestLog::EndMessage;
3670 m_testCtx.getLog() << TestLog::Message << "Note: program " << programNdx << " is similar to above, except some constants are different, and: " << m_programs.back().description() << TestLog::EndMessage;
3720 log << TestLog::Message << "Tessellation level sets: " << tessLevelsStr << TestLog::EndMessage;
3742 << TestLog::EndMessage;
3757 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: tessellation coordinate at index " << vtxNdx << " differs between two primitives drawn in one draw call" << TestLog::EndMessage
3758 << TestLog::Message << "Note: the coordinate is " << prim0Vertices[vtxNdx] << " for the first primitive and " << prim1Vertices[vtxNdx] << " for the second" << TestLog::EndMessage
3759 << TestLog::Message << "Note: tessellation levels for both primitives were: " << tessellationLevelsString(&inner[0], &outer[0]) << TestLog::EndMessage;
3774 << " - case B: program " << programNdx << ", tessellation levels: " << tessLevels.description() << TestLog::EndMessage;
3812 m_testCtx.getLog() << TestLog::Message << "Failure: tessellation coordinate at index " << vtxNdx << " differs between two programs" << TestLog::EndMessage
3813 << TestLog::Message << "Note: the coordinate is " << coordsA[vtxNdx] << " for the first program and " << coordsB[vtxNdx] << " for the other" << TestLog::EndMessage;
3961 m_testCtx.getLog() << TestLog::Message << "Note: program " << programNdx << " is similar to above, except some constants are different, and: " << m_programs.back().description() << TestLog::EndMessage;
4015 << " for the " << edgeDesc.description() << " edge, and with various levels for other edges, and with all programs" << TestLog::EndMessage;
4033 << tfResult.varying.size() << ", expected " << refNumVertices << TestLog::EndMessage
4036 << containerStr(patchTessLevels, 6) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4066 << ", expected " << refNumVerticesOnOuterEdge << TestLog::EndMessage
4067 << TestLog::Message << "Note: vertices on the outer edge are:\n" << containerStr(outerEdgeVertices, 5, 0) << TestLog::EndMessage
4069 << ", tessellation levels: " << tessellationLevelsString(innerLevels, outerLevels) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4087 << tessellationLevelsString(innerLevels, outerLevels) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4091 << " - case B: " << containerStr(outerEdgeVertices, 5, 14) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4293 << " for the " << edgeDesc.description() << " edge, and with various levels for other edges" << TestLog::EndMessage;
4308 << tfResult.varying.size() << ", expected " << refNumVertices << TestLog::EndMessage
4310 << containerStr(patchTessLevels, 6) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4371 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: edge doesn't contain both endpoints, " << endpointA << " and " << endpointB << TestLog::EndMessage
4373 << "\nmirrored vertices:\n" << containerStr(mirroredEdgeVertices, 5) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4383 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: the set of mirrored edges isn't equal to the set of non-mirrored edges (ignoring endpoints and possible middle)" << TestLog::EndMessage
4385 << "\nmirrored vertices:\n" << containerStr(mirroredEdgeVertices, 5) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4557 << " for the " << edgeDesc.description() << " edge, and with various levels for other edges" << TestLog::EndMessage;
4567 << tfResult.varying.size() << ", expected " << refNumVertices << TestLog::EndMessage
4569 << containerStr(patchTessLevels, 6) << TestLog::EndMessage;
4624 << " doesn't match the set of vertices on the " << edgeDescriptions[0].description() << " edge" << TestLog::EndMessage
4627 << "\non " << edgeDescriptions[0].description() << " edge:\n" << containerStr(firstEdgeVertices, 5) << TestLog::EndMessage;
5051 log << TestLog::Message << "Testing with tessellation levels: " << tessellationLevelsString(&tessLevels[6*tessLevelCaseNdx+0], &tessLevels[6*tessLevelCaseNdx+2]) << TestLog::EndMessage;
5068 << TestLog::EndMessage;
5105 m_testCtx.getLog() << TestLog::Message << "Failure: tess coord component isn't in range [0,1]" << TestLog::EndMessage;
5139 m_testCtx.getLog() << TestLog::Message << "Failure: comp + (1.0-comp) doesn't equal 1.0 for some component of tessellation coordinate" << TestLog::EndMessage;
5359 << "but later patches have one or more invalid (i.e. less than or equal to 0.0) relevant outer levels" << TestLog::EndMessage;
5372 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: expected " << numVerticesInDrawCall << " vertices from transform feedback, got " << tfResult.varying.size() << TestLog::EndMessage;
5431 << "[x0=" << x0 << ", y0=" << y0 << ", x1=" << x1 << ", y1=" << y1 << "]" << TestLog::EndMessage
5433 << tessellationLevelsString(&attr[0], &attr[1]) << TestLog::EndMessage;
5454 << " (they all correspond to patches that should be discarded)" << TestLog::EndMessage
5455 << TestLog::Message << "Note: pixel " << tcu::IVec2(x, y) << " isn't black" << TestLog::EndMessage;
6200 log << TestLog::Message << "Failure: transform feedback returned " << tfResult.varying.size() << " vertices; expected " << numVertices << TestLog::EndMessage;
6217 << ", should be in range [0, " << numTEInputs << "]" << TestLog::EndMessage;
6223 << basicSubobjectAtIndex(tfResult.varying[vertexNdx], m_tesInputs, topLevelArraySize) << " failed" << TestLog::EndMessage;
6397 log << TestLog::Message << "Note: input data for in_v_attr:\n" << arrayStr(attributes, 4) << TestLog::EndMessage;
6493 << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
6984 m_testCtx.getLog() << tcu::TestLog::Message << "u_unreferenced resource index: " << resourcePos << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
6995 << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
7011 m_testCtx.getLog() << tcu::TestLog::Message << "u_referenced resource index: " << resourcePos << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
7022 << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
7155 m_testCtx.getLog() << tcu::TestLog::Message << "v_perPatch resource index: " << resourcePos << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
7166 << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
7182 m_testCtx.getLog() << tcu::TestLog::Message << "v_perVertex resource index: " << resourcePos << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;
7193 << tcu::TestLog::EndMessage;