1 Subject: Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour 2 From: "Anders Larsen" <alarsen (a] rea.de> 3 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:21 +0200 4 To: Wolfgang Denk <wd (a] denx.de> 5 6 ... 7 >I still see references to _armboot_start, _armboot_end_data, and 8 >_armboot_end - which role do these play now? Can we get rid of them? 9 > 10 >How are they (should they be) set in your memory map above? 11 12 _armboot_start contains the value of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE (0xA07E0000); it seems 13 CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE and _armboot_start are both used for the same purpose in 14 different parts of the (ARM) code. 15 Furthermore, the startup code (cpu/<arm>/start.S) internally uses 16 another variable (_TEXT_BASE) with the same content as _armboot_start. 17 I agree that this mess should be cleaned up. 18
