1 I2C Bus Arbitration 2 =================== 3 4 While I2C supports multi-master buses this is difficult to get right. 5 The implementation on the master side in software is quite complex. 6 Clock-stretching and the arbitrary time that an I2C transaction can take 7 make it difficult to share the bus fairly in the face of high traffic. 8 When one or more masters can be reset independently part-way through a 9 transaction it is hard to know the state of the bus. 10 11 U-Boot provides a scheme based on two 'claim' GPIOs, one driven by the 12 AP (Application Processor, meaning the main CPU) and one driven by the EC 13 (Embedded Controller, a small CPU aimed at handling system tasks). With 14 these they can communicate and reliably share the bus. This scheme has 15 minimal overhead and involves very little code. The scheme can survive 16 reboots by either side without difficulty. 17 18 Since U-Boot runs on the AP, the terminology used is 'our' claim GPIO, 19 meaning the AP's, and 'their' claim GPIO, meaning the EC's. This terminology 20 is used by the device tree bindings in Linux also. 21 22 The driver is implemented as an I2C mux, as it is in Linux. See 23 i2c-arb-gpio-challenge for the implementation. 24 25 GPIO lines are shared between the AP and EC to manage the bus. The AP and EC 26 each have a 'bus claim' line, which is an output that the other can see. 27 28 - AP_CLAIM: output from AP, signalling to the EC that the AP wants the bus 29 - EC_CLAIM: output from EC, signalling to the AP that the EC wants the bus 30 31 The basic algorithm is to assert your line when you want the bus, then make 32 sure that the other side doesn't want it also. A detailed explanation is best 33 done with an example. 34 35 Let's say the AP wants to claim the bus. It: 36 37 1. Asserts AP_CLAIM 38 2. Waits a little bit for the other side to notice (slew time) 39 3. Checks EC_CLAIM. If this is not asserted, then the AP has the bus, and we 40 are done 41 4. Otherwise, wait for a few milliseconds (retry time) and see if EC_CLAIM is 42 released 43 5. If not, back off, release the claim and wait for a few more milliseconds 44 (retry time again) 45 6. Go back to 1 if things don't look wedged (wait time has expired) 46 7. Panic. The other side is hung with the CLAIM line set. 47 48 The same algorithm applies on the EC. 49 50 To release the bus, just de-assert the claim line. 51 52 Typical delays are: 53 - slew time 10 us 54 - retry time 3 ms 55 - wait time - 50ms 56 57 In general the traffic is fairly light, and in particular the EC wants access 58 to the bus quite rarely (maybe every 10s or 30s to check the battery). This 59 scheme works very nicely with very low contention. There is only a 10 us 60 wait for access to the bus assuming that the other side isn't using it. 61
