resources/articles/contacts.jd

page.title=Using the Contacts API
@jd:body

<p>Starting from Android 2.0 (API Level 5), the Android platform provides an
improved Contacts API for managing and integrating contacts from multiple
accounts and from other data sources. To handle overlapping data from multiple
sources, the contacts content provider aggregates similar contacts and presents
them to users as a single entity. This article describes how to use the new API
to manage contacts.</p>

<p>The new Contacts API is defined in the
{@link android.provider.ContactsContract android.provider.ContactsContract}
and related classes. The older API is still supported, although deprecated.
If you have an existing application that uses the older API,
see <a href="#legacy">Considerations for legacy apps</a>, below, for ideas
on how to support the Contacts API in your app.</p>

<p>If you'd like to look at an applied example of how to use the new Contacts
API, including how to support both the new and older API in a single app,
please see the <a
href="{@docRoot}resources/samples/BusinessCard/index.html">Business Card
sample application</a>.</p>

<h3>Data structure of Contacts</h3>

<p>In the new Contacts API, data is laid out in three primary tables:
<em>contacts</em>, <em>raw contacts</em>, and <em>data</em>, a structure that
is slightly different from that used in the older API. The new structure
allows the system to more easily store and manage information for a
specific contact from multiple contacts sources. </p>

<img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; width: 471px; height: 255px;" src="images/contacts-2.png" alt="" border="0">

<ul>
<li><code>Data</code> is a generic table that stores all of the data points
associated with a raw contact. Each row stores data of a specific kind &mdash;
for example  name, photo, email addresses, phone numbers, and group memberships.
Each row is tagged with a MIME type to identify what type of data it can
contain, across the entire column. Columns are generic and the type of data they
contain is determined by the kind of data stored in each row. For example, if a
row's data kind is <code>Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE</code>, then the first column
stores the phone number, but if the data kind is
<code>Email.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE</code>, then the column stores the email address.

<p>The {@link android.provider.ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds}
class provides subclasses corresponding to common MIME types for contacts data.
If needed, your application or other contacts sources can define additional MIME
types for data rows. For more information about the Data table and examples of
how to use it, see {@link android.provider.ContactsContract.Data android.provider.ContactsContract.Data}.</p></li>

<li>A row in the <code>RawContacts</code> table represents the set of
<code>Data</code> and other information describing a person and associated with
a single contacts source. For example, a row might define the data associated
with a person's Google or Exchange account or Facebook friend. For more
information, see
{@link android.provider.ContactsContract.RawContacts ContactsContract.RawContacts}.</p>

<li>A row in the <code>Contacts</code> table represents an aggregate of one or
more <code>RawContacts</code> describing the same person (or entity).

<p>As mentioned above, the Contacts content provider automatically aggregates
Raw Contacts into a single Contact entry, where possible, since common data
fields (such as name or email address) are likely to be stored in each raw
contact. Since the aggregation logic maintains the entries in the Contact rows,
the entries can be read but should not be modified.  See the section <a
href="#aggregation">Aggregation of contacts</a>, below, for more details,
including and information on how to
control aggregation.</li>

</ul>

<p>When displaying contacts to users, applications should typically operate on
the Contacts level, since it provides a unified, aggregated view of contacts
from various underlying sources. </p>

<h4>Example: Inserting a Phone Number</h4>

<p>To insert a phone number using the new APIs you'll need the ID of the Raw
Contact to attach the phone number to, then you'll need to create a Data
row:</p>

<pre>import android.provider.ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone;
...
ContentValues values = new ContentValues();
values.put(Phone.RAW_CONTACT_ID, rawContactId);
values.put(Phone.NUMBER, phoneNumber);
values.put(Phone.TYPE, Phone.TYPE_MOBILE);
Uri uri = getContentResolver().insert(Phone.CONTENT_URI, values);</pre>


<h3 id="aggregation">Aggregation of contacts</h3>

<p>When users sync contacts from multiple sources, several contacts might refer
to the same person or entity, but with slightly different (or overlapping) data.
 For example, "Bob Parr" might be a user's co-worker and also his personal
friend, so the user might have his contact information stored in both a
corporate email account and a personal account. To provide a simplified view for
the user, the system locates such overlapping contacts and combines them into a
single, aggregate contact.  </p>

<p>The system automatically aggregates contacts by default. However, if needed,
your application can control how the system handles aggregation or it can
disable aggregation altogether, as described in the sections below.</p>

<h4>Automatic aggregation</h4>

<p>When a raw contact is added or modified, the system looks for matching
(overlapping) raw contacts with which to aggregate it. It may not find any
matching raw contacts, in which case it will create an aggregate contact that
contains just the original raw contact. If it finds a single match,it creates a
new contact that contains the two raw contacts. And it may even find multiple
similar raw contacts, in which case it chooses the closest match. </p>

<p>Two raw contacts are considered to be a match if at least one of these
conditions is met:</p>

<ul>
<li>They have matching names.</li>
<li>Their names consist of the same words but in different order
(for example, "Bob Parr" and "Parr, Bob")</li>
<li>One of them has a common short name for the other (for example,
"Bob Parr" and "Robert Parr")</li>
<li>One of them has just a first or last name and it matches the other
raw contact. This rule is less reliable, so it only applies if the two
raw contacts are also sharing some other data like a phone number, an
email address or a nickname (for example, Helen ["elastigirl"] = Helen
Parr ["elastigirl"])</li>
<li>At least one of the two raw contacts is missing the name altogether
and they are sharing a phone number, an email address or a nickname (for
example, Bob Parr [incredible (a] android.com] = incredible (a] android.com).</li>
</ul>

<p>When comparing names, the system ignores upper/lower case differences
(Bob=BOB=bob) and diacritical marks (Hlne=Helene). When comparing two
phone numbers the system ignores special characters such as "*", "#",
"(", ")", and whitespace. Also if the only difference between two numbers
is that one has a country code and the other does not, then the system
considers those to be a match (except for numbers in the Japan country code).</p>

<p>Automatic aggregation is not permanent; any change of a constituent raw
contact may create a new aggregate or break up an existing one.</p>

<h4>Explicit aggregation</h4>

<p>In some cases, the system's automatic aggregation may not meet the
requirements of your application or sync adapter. There are two sets of APIs you
can use to control aggregation explicitly: <em>aggregation modes</em> allow you
to control automatic aggregation behaviors and <em>aggregation exceptions</em>
allow you to override automated aggregation entirely.

<p><strong>Aggregation modes</strong></p>

<p>You can set an aggregation mode for each raw contact individually. To do so,
add a mode constant as the value of the <code>AGGREGATION_MODE column</code> in
the <code>RawContact</code> row. The mode constants available include: </p>

<ul>
<li><code>AGGREGATION_MODE_DEFAULT</code> &mdash; normal mode, automatic
aggregation is allowed.</li>
<li><code>AGGREGATION_MODE_DISABLED</code> &mdash; automatic aggregation is not
allowed. The raw contact will not be aggregated.</li>
<li><code>AGGREGATION_MODE_SUSPENDED</code> &mdash; automatic aggregation is
deactivated. If the raw contact is already a part of an aggregated contact when
aggregation mode changes to suspended, it will remain in the aggregate, even if
it changes in such a way that it no longer matches the other raw contacts in the
aggregate.</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Aggregation exceptions</strong></p>

<p>To keep two raw contacts unconditionally together or unconditionally apart,
you can add a row to the
{@link android.provider.ContactsContract.AggregationExceptions} table. Exceptions
defined in the table override all automatic aggregation rules. </p>


<h3>Loookup URI</h3>

<p>The new Contacts API introduces the notion of a lookup key for a contact. If
your application needs to maintain references to contacts, you should use lookup
keys instead of the traditional row ids. You can acquire a lookup key from the
contact itself, it is a column on the
{@link android.provider.ContactsContract.Contacts} table. Once you have a lookup key,
you can construct a URI in this way:</p>

<pre>Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(Contacts.CONTENT_LOOKUP_URI, lookupKey)</pre>

<p>and use it like you would use a traditional content URI, for example: </p>

<pre>Cursor c = getContentResolver().query(lookupUri, new String[]{Contacts.DISPLAY_NAME}, ...);
try {
    c.moveToFirst();
    String displayName = c.getString(0);
} finally {
    c.close();
}</pre>

<p>The reason for this complication is that regular contact row IDs are
inherently volatile. Let's say your app stored a long ID of a contact. Then the
user goes and manually joins the contact with some other contact. Now there is a
single contact where there used to be two, and the stored long contact ID points
nowhere.

<p>The lookup key helps resolve the contact in this case. The key is a string
that concatenates the server-side identities of the raw contacts. Your
application can use that string to find a contact, regardless whether the raw
contact is aggregated with others or not. </p>

<p>If performance is a concern for your application, you might want to store
both the lookup and the long ID of a contact and construct a lookup URI out of
both IDs, as shown here:</p>

<pre>Uri lookupUri = getLookupUri(contactId, lookupKey)</pre>

<p>When both IDs are present in the URI, the system will try to use the long ID
first. That is a very quick query. If the contact is not found, or if the one
that is found has the wrong lookup key, the content provider will parse the
lookup key and track down the constituent raw contacts. If your app
bulk-processes contacts, you should maintain both IDs. If your app works with a
single contact per user action, you probably don't need to bother with storing
the long ID.</p>

Android itself uses lookup URIs whenever there is a need to reference a contact,
such as with shortcuts or Quick Contact, and also during editing or even viewing
a contact. The latter case is less obvious &mdash; why would a contact ID change
while we are simply viewing the contact? It could change because there might be
a sync going in the background, and the contact might get automatically
aggregated with another while being viewed.</p>

<p>In summary: whenever you need to reference a contact, we recommend that you
do so by its lookup URI.</p>


<h3 id="legacy">Considerations for legacy applications</h3>

<p>If you have an existing application that uses the older Contacts API,
you should consider upgrading it to use the new API. You have four options: </p>

<ul>
<li>Leave it as-is and rely on the Contacts compatibility mode.</li>
<li>Upgrade the app and discontinue support of pre-Android 2.0 platforms.</li>
<li>Build a new version of the app for the new API, while keeping the old version available.</li>
<li>Make the app use the right set of APIs depending on the platform where it is deployed. </li>
</ul>

<p>Let's consider these options one by one.</p>

<h4>Using compatibility mode</h4>

<p>Compatibility mode is the easiest option because you just leave the
application as is, and it should run on Android 2.0 as long as it only uses
public APIs. A couple examples of the use of non-public API include the use of
explicit table names in nested queries and the use of columns that were not
declared as public constants in the {@link android.provider.Contacts} class.
</p>

<p>Even if the application currently runs, you don't want to leave it like this
for long. The main reason is that it will only have access to contacts from one
account, namely the first Google account on the device. If the user opens other
accounts in addition to or instead of a Google account, your application will
not be able to access those contacts.</p>


<h4>Upgrading to the new API and dropping support for older platforms</h4>

<p>If your application will no longer target platforms older than
Android 2.0, you can upgrade to the new API in this way:</p>

<ul>
<li>Replace all usages of {@link android.provider.Contacts} with calls to new
API. After you are done, you should not see any deprecation warnings during
application build. The new application will be able to take full advantage of
multiple accounts and other new features of Android 2.0. </p>

<li>In the application's manifest, update (or add) the
<code>android:minSdkVersion</code> attribute to the
<code>&lt;uses-sdk&gt;</code> element. To use the new Contacts API, you should
set the value of the attribute to "5" (or higher, as appropriate). For more
information about <code>android:minSdkVersion</code>, see the documentation for
the <a
href="{@docRoot}guide/topics/manifest/uses-sdk-element.html"><code>&lt;uses-sdk&gt;</code></a>
element. For more information about the value of the
<code>minSdkVersion</code>, see <a
href="{@docRoot}guide/appendix/api-levels.html">API Levels</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h4>Maintaining two applications</h4>

<p>You may decide to have two different applications: one for pre-Android 2.0
platforms and one for Android 2.0 and beyond. If so, here's what you'll need to do:</p>

<ul>
  <li>Clone your existing app. </li>
  <li>Change the old application: </li>
    <ul>
      <li>At launch time, check the version of the SDK. The version of the SDK
is available as {@link android.os.Build.VERSION#SDK android.os.Build.VERSION.SDK}.</li>
      <li>If the SDK version is greater or equal to 5 (Android 2.0), show a dialog
suggesting to the user that it's time to go to Market and find a new version of
the app. You can even provide a link to the new app on Market (see <a
href="{@docRoot}guide/publishing/publishing.html#marketintent">Using Intents
to Launch Market</a>). </li>
    </ul>
  <li>Change the new application:</li>
    <ul>
      <li>Replace all usages of the older Contacts API with calls to new API.
The new application will be able to take full advantage of multiple accounts
and other new features of Android 2.0. </li>
      <li>Modify that application's AndroidManifest.xml file: </li>
        <ul>
          <li>Give the application a new name and a new package name. Currently
Android Market does not allow you to have two applications with the same
name/package.</li>
          <li>Update (or add) the <code>android:minSdkVersion</code> attribute
to the <code>&lt;uses-sdk&gt;</code> element. To use the new Contacts API,
you should set the value of the attribute to "5" (or higher, as appropriate).</li>
        </ul>
      </ul>
    <li>Publish both apps on Market, the old app one as an upgrade and the
other as new. Make sure to explain the difference between the apps in their
descriptions.</li>
</ul>

<p>This plan has its disadvantages: </p>

<ul>
<li>The new application will not be able to read the old application's data.
Application data can only be accessed by code living in the same package. So
databases, shared preferences, and so on, will need to be populated from
scratch.</li>
<li>The upgrade process is too clunky for the user. Some users may choose
to either stay with the crippled old version or uninstall altogether.</li>
</ul>

<h4>Supporting the old and new APIs in the same application</h4>

<p>This is a bit tricky, but the result is worth the effort. You can
build a single package that will work on any platform:</p>

<p>Go through the existing application and factor out all access to
{@link android.provider.Contacts} into one class, such as ContactAccessorOldApi.
For example, if you have code like this:

<pre>    protected void pickContact() {
        startActivityForResult(new Intent(Intent.ACTION_PICK, People.CONTENT_URI), 0);
    }</pre>

<p>it will change to:</p>


<pre>    private final ContactAccessorOldApi mContactAccessor = new ContactAccessorOldApi();

    void pickContact() {
        startActivityForResult(mContactAccessor.getContactPickerIntent(), 0);
    }</pre>

<p>The corresponding method on ContactAccessorOldApi will look like this:</p>

<pre>    public Intent getContactPickerIntent() {
        return new Intent(Intent.ACTION_PICK, People.CONTENT_URI);
    }</pre>

<p>Once you are done, you should see deprecation warnings coming only
from ContactAccessorOldApi. </p>

<p>Create a new abstract class ContactAccessor, make sure the abstract
class has all method signatures from ContactAccessorOldApi. Make
ContactAccessorOldApi extend ContactAccessor:</p>

<pre>    public abstract class ContactAccessor {
        public abstract Intent getContactPickerIntent();
        ...
    }</pre>

<p>Create a new subclass of ContactAccessor, ContactAccessorNewApi and
implement all methods using the new API:</p>

<pre>    public class ContactAccessorNewApi extends ContactAccessor {
        &#64;Override
        public Intent getContactPickerIntent() {
            return new Intent(Intent.ACTION_PICK, Contacts.CONTENT_URI);
        }
        ...
    }</pre>

<p>At this point, you have two implementations of the same API, one using the
old API and another using the new API. Let's plug them in. Add this code to
the ContactAccessor class:</p>

<pre>    private static ContactAccessor sInstance;

    public static ContactAccessor getInstance() {
        if (sInstance == null) {
            String className;
            int sdkVersion = Integer.parseInt(Build.VERSION.SDK);
            if (sdkVersion &lt; Build.VERSION_CODES.ECLAIR) {
                className = "ContactAccessorOldApi";
            } else {
                className = "ContactAccessorNewApi";
            }
            try {
                Class&lt;? extends ContactAccessor&gt; clazz =
                        Class.forName(ContactAccessor.class.getPackage() + "." + className)
                                .asSubclass(ContactAccessor.class);
                sInstance = clazz.newInstance();
            } catch (Exception e) {
                throw new IllegalStateException(e);
            }
        }
        return sInstance;
    }</pre>

<p>Now replace references to ContactsAccessorOldApi with references to
ContactsAccessor:</p>

<pre>    private final ContactAccessor mContactAccessor = ContactAccessor.getInstance();</pre>

<p>You are done! Now you will want to test on Android 2.0, 1.6 and 1.5.</p>

<p>We hope you like the new features and APIs we've added to Contacts in
Android 2.0, and we can't wait to see what cool things developers do with
the new APIs.</p>