Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in docs
      1 <html>
      2 <head>
      3 <title>Dalvik Bytecode Verifier Notes</title>
      4 </head>
      5 
      6 <body>
      7 <h1>Dalvik Bytecode Verifier Notes</h1>
      8 
      9 <p>
     10 The bytecode verifier in the Dalvik VM attempts to provide the same sorts
     11 of checks and guarantees that other popular virtual machines do.  We
     12 perform generally the same set of checks as are described in _The Java
     13 Virtual Machine Specification, Second Edition_, including the updates
     14 planned for the Third Edition.
     15 
     16 <p>
     17 Verification can be enabled for all classes, disabled for all, or enabled
     18 only for "remote" (non-bootstrap) classes.  It should be performed for any
     19 class that will be processed with the DEX optimizer, and in fact the
     20 default VM behavior is to only optimize verified classes.
     21 
     22 
     23 <h2>Why Verify?</h2>
     24 
     25 <p>
     26 The verification process adds additional time to the build and to
     27 the installation of new applications.  It's fairly quick for app-sized
     28 DEX files, but rather slow for the big "core" and "framework" files.
     29 Why do it all, when our system relies on UNIX processes for security?
     30 <p>
     31 <ol>
     32     <li>Optimizations.  The interpreter can ignore a lot of potential
     33     error cases because the verifier guarantees that they are impossible.
     34     Also, we can optimize the DEX file more aggressively if we start
     35     with a stronger set of assumptions about the bytecode.
     36     <li>"Precise" GC.  The work peformed during verification has significant
     37     overlap with the work required to compute register use maps for
     38     type-precise GC.
     39     <li>Intra-application security.  If an app wants to download bits
     40     of interpreted code over the network and execute them, it can safely
     41     do so using well-established security mechanisms.
     42     <li>3rd party app failure analysis.  We have no way to control the
     43     tools and post-processing utilities that external developers employ,
     44     so when we get bug reports with a weird exception or native crash
     45     it's very helpful to start with the assumption that the bytecode
     46     is valid.
     47 </ol>
     48 <p>
     49 It's also a convenient framework to deal with certain situations, notably
     50 replacement of instructions that access volatile 64-bit fields with
     51 more rigorous versions that guarantee atomicity.
     52 
     53 
     54 <h2>Verifier Differences</h2>
     55 
     56 <p>
     57 There are a few checks that the Dalvik bytecode verifier does not perform,
     58 because they're not relevant.  For example:
     59 <ul>
     60     <li>Type restrictions on constant pool references are not enforced,
     61     because Dalvik does not have a pool of typed constants.  (Dalvik
     62     uses a simple index into type-specific pools.)
     63     <li>Verification of the operand stack size is not performed, because
     64     Dalvik does not have an operand stack.
     65     <li>Limitations on <code>jsr</code> and <code>ret</code> do not apply,
     66     because Dalvik doesn't support subroutines.
     67 </ul>
     68 
     69 In some cases they are implemented differently, e.g.:
     70 <ul>
     71     <li>In a conventional VM, backward branches and exceptions are
     72     forbidden when a local variable holds an uninitialized reference.  The
     73     restriction was changed to mark registers as invalid when they hold
     74     references to the uninitialized result of a previous invocation of the
     75     same <code>new-instance</code> instruction.
     76     This solves the same problem -- trickery potentially allowing
     77     uninitialized objects to slip past the verifier -- without unduly
     78     limiting branches.
     79 </ul>
     80 
     81 There are also some new ones, such as:
     82 <ul>
     83     <li>The <code>move-exception</code> instruction can only appear as
     84     the first instruction in an exception handler.
     85     <li>The <code>move-result*</code> instructions can only appear
     86     immediately after an appropriate <code>invoke-*</code>
     87     or <code>filled-new-array</code> instruction.
     88 </ul>
     89 
     90 <p>
     91 The VM is permitted but not required to enforce "structured locking"
     92 constraints, which are designed to ensure that, when a method returns, all
     93 monitors locked by the method have been unlocked an equal number of times.
     94 This is not currently implemented.
     95 
     96 <p>
     97 The Dalvik verifier is more restrictive than other VMs in one area:
     98 type safety on sub-32-bit integer widths.  These additional restrictions
     99 should make it impossible to, say, pass a value outside the range
    100 [-128, 127] to a function that takes a <code>byte</code> as an argument.
    101 
    102 
    103 <h2>Verification Failures</h2>
    104 
    105 <p>
    106 The verifier may reject a class immediately, or it may defer throwing
    107 an exception until the code is actually used.  For example, if a class
    108 attempts to perform an illegal access on a field, the VM should throw
    109 an IllegalAccessError the first time the instruction is encountered.
    110 On the other hand, if a class contains an invalid bytecode, it should be
    111 rejected immediately with a VerifyError.
    112 
    113 <p>
    114 Immediate VerifyErrors are accompanied by detailed, if somewhat cryptic,
    115 information in the log file.  From this it's possible to determine the
    116 exact instruction that failed, and the reason for the failure.
    117 
    118 <p>
    119 It's a bit tricky to implement deferred verification errors in Dalvik.
    120 A few approaches were considered:
    121 
    122 <ol>
    123 <li>We could replace the invalid field access instruction with a special
    124 instruction that generates an illegal access error, and allow class
    125 verification to complete successfully.  This type of verification must
    126 be deferred to first class load, rather than be performed ahead of time
    127 during DEX optimization, because some failures will depend on the current
    128 execution environment (e.g. not all classes are available at dexopt time).
    129 At that point the bytecode instructions are mapped read-only during
    130 verification, so rewriting them isn't possible.
    131 </li>
    132 
    133 <li>We can perform the access checks when the field/method/class is
    134 resolved.  In a typical VM implementation we would do the check when the
    135 entry is resolved in the context of the current classfile, but our DEX
    136 files combine multiple classfiles together, merging the field/method/class
    137 resolution results into a single large table.  Once one class successfully
    138 resolves the field, every other class in the same DEX file would be able
    139 to access the field.  This is incorrect.
    140 </li>
    141 
    142 <li>Perform the access checks on every field/method/class access.
    143 This adds significant overhead.  This is mitigated somewhat by the DEX
    144 optimizer, which will convert many field/method/class accesses into a
    145 simpler form after performing the access check.  However, not all accesses
    146 can be optimized (e.g. accesses to classes unknown at dexopt time),
    147 and we don't currently have an optimized form of certain instructions
    148 (notably static field operations).
    149 </li>
    150 </ol>
    151 
    152 <p>
    153 In early versions of Dalvik (as found in Android 1.6 and earlier), the verifier
    154 simply regarded all problems as immediately fatal.  This generally worked,
    155 but in some cases the VM was rejecting classes because of bits of code
    156 that were never used.  The VerifyError itself was sometimes difficult to
    157 decipher, because it was thrown during verification rather than at the
    158 point where the problem was first noticed during execution.
    159 <p>
    160 The current version uses a variation of approach #1.  The dexopt
    161 command works the way it did before, leaving the code untouched and
    162 flagging fully-correct classes as "pre-verified".  When the VM loads a
    163 class that didn't pass pre-verification, the verifier is invoked.  If a
    164 "deferrable" problem is detected, a modifiable copy of the instructions
    165 in the problematic method is made.  In that copy, the troubled instruction
    166 is replaced with an "always throw" opcode, and verification continues.
    167 
    168 <p>
    169 In the example used earlier, an attempt to read from an inaccessible
    170 field would result in the "field get" instruction being replaced by
    171 "always throw IllegalAccessError on field X".  Creating copies of method
    172 bodies requires additional heap space, but since this affects very few
    173 methods overall the memory impact should be minor.
    174 
    175 <p>
    176 <address>Copyright &copy; 2008 The Android Open Source Project</address>
    177 
    178 </body>
    179 </html>
    180