README
1 =============================================================================
2 Notes about performance benchmarks
3 =============================================================================
4 For each benchmark, here is a brief description and notes about its
5 strengths and weaknesses.
6
7 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Artificial stress tests
9 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 bigcode1, bigcode2:
11 - Description: Executes a lot of (nonsensical) code.
12 - Strengths: Demonstrates the cost of translation which is a large part
13 of runtime, particularly on larger programs.
14 - Weaknesses: Highly artificial.
15
16 heap:
17 - Description: Does a lot of heap allocation and deallocation, and has a lot
18 of heap blocks live while doing so.
19 - Strengths: Stress test for an important sub-system; bug #105039 showed
20 that inefficiencies in heap allocation can make a big
21 difference to programs that allocate a lot.
22 - Weaknesses: Highly artificial -- allocation pattern is not real, and only
23 a few different size allocations are used.
24
25 sarp:
26 - Description: Does a lot of stack allocation and deallocation.
27 - Strengths: Tests for a specific performance bug that existed in 3.1.0 and
28 all earlier versions.
29 - Weaknesses: Highly artificial.
30
31 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
32 Real programs
33 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
34 bz2:
35 - Description: Burrows-Wheeler compression and decompression.
36 - Strengths: A real, widely used program, very similar to the 256.bzip2
37 SPEC2000 benchmark. Not dominated by any code, the hottest
38 55 blocks account for only 90% of execution. Has lots of
39 short blocks and stresses the memory system hard.
40 - Weaknesses: None, really, it's a good benchmark.
41
42 fbench:
43 - Description: Does some ray-tracing.
44 - Strengths: Moderately realistic program.
45 - Weaknesses: Dominated by sin and cos, which are not widely used, and are
46 hardware-supported on x86 but not on other platforms such as
47 PPC.
48
49 ffbench:
50 - Description: Does a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
51 - Strengths: Tests common FP ops (mostly adding and multiplying array
52 elements), FFT is a very important operation.
53 - Weaknesses: Dominated by the inner loop, which is quite long and flatters
54 Valgrind due to the small dispatcher overhead.
55
56 tinycc:
57 - Description: A very small and fast C compiler. A munged version of
58 Fabrice Bellard's TinyCC compiling itself multiple times.
59 - Strengths: A real program, lots of code (top 100 blocks only account for
60 47% of execution), involves large irregular data structures
61 (presumably, since it's a compiler). Does lots of
62 malloc/free calls and so changes that make a big improvement
63 to perf/heap typically cause a small improvement.
64 - Weaknesses None, really, it's a good benchmark.
65
66