Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in tests
      1 
      2 #include <stdio.h>
      3 #include <stdlib.h>
      4 
      5 // Do a test comparison.  By default memcheck does not use the
      6 // expensive EQ/NE scheme as it would be too expensive.  The
      7 // assignment to *hack is a trick to fool memcheck's bogus-literal
      8 // spotter into thinking this is a bb which needs unusually careful
      9 // attention, and therefore the expensive EQ/NE scheme is used.
     10 
     11 __attribute__((noinline)) // keep your grubby hands off this fn
     12 void foo ( int* p1, int* p2, unsigned int * hack )
     13 {
     14   *hack = 0x80808080;
     15   if (*p1 == *p2)
     16     printf("foo\n");
     17   else
     18     printf("bar\n");
     19 }
     20 
     21 static void bar ( void );
     22 int main ( void )
     23 {
     24 
     25   unsigned int hack;
     26 
     27   int* junk1 = malloc(sizeof(int));
     28   int* junk2 = malloc(sizeof(int));
     29 
     30   short* ps1 = (short*)junk1;
     31   short* ps2 = (short*)junk2;
     32 
     33   int*   pi1 = (int*)junk1;
     34   int*   pi2 = (int*)junk2;
     35   bar();
     36   // both words completely undefined.  This should give an error.
     37   foo(pi1,pi2, &hack);
     38 
     39   // set half of the words, but to different values; so this should
     40   // not give an error, since inspection of the defined parts
     41   // shows the two values are not equal, and so the definedness of
     42   // the conclusion is unaffected by the undefined halves.
     43   *ps1 = 41;
     44   *ps2 = 42;
     45   foo(pi1,pi2, &hack);
     46 
     47   // set half of the words, but to the same value, so this forces the
     48   // result of the comparison to depend on the undefined halves.
     49   // should give an error
     50   *ps1 = 42;
     51   *ps2 = 42;
     52   foo(pi1,pi2, &hack);
     53 
     54   return 0;
     55 }
     56 
     57 // Note: on ppc32/64 the second call to foo() does give an error,
     58 // since the expensive EQ/NE scheme does not apply to the CmpORD
     59 // primops used by ppc.
     60 //
     61 // On arm, the "normal" (x86-like) comparison primops are used, so
     62 // the expensive EQ/NE scheme could apply.  However, it doesn't,
     63 // because the constant 0x80808080 is placed in a constant pool
     64 // and so never appears as a literal, and so the instrumenter
     65 // never spots it and so doesn't use the expensive scheme (for foo).
     66 // Hence also on ARM we get 3 errors, not 2.
     67 //
     68 // s390x is even more complicated: Depending on the architecture
     69 // level we have the 0x80808080 either in the literal pool (3 errors)
     70 // or with the extended immediate facility in an instruction (2 errors).
     71 static __attribute__((noinline)) void bar ( void )
     72 {
     73 #if defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__arm__)
     74   fprintf(stderr, "Currently running on ppc32/64/arm: this test should give 3 errors, not 2.\n");
     75 #endif
     76 #if defined(__s390__)
     77   fprintf(stderr, "On s390 we might see 2 or 3 errors.\n");
     78 #endif
     79 }
     80