Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in doc
      1 
      2 namespace Eigen {
      3 
      4 /** \page TopicWritingEfficientProductExpression Writing efficient matrix product expressions
      5 
      6 In general achieving good performance with Eigen does no require any special effort:
      7 simply write your expressions in the most high level way. This is especially true
      8 for small fixed size matrices. For large matrices, however, it might be useful to
      9 take some care when writing your expressions in order to minimize useless evaluations
     10 and optimize the performance.
     11 In this page we will give a brief overview of the Eigen's internal mechanism to simplify
     12 and evaluate complex product expressions, and discuss the current limitations.
     13 In particular we will focus on expressions matching level 2 and 3 BLAS routines, i.e,
     14 all kind of matrix products and triangular solvers.
     15 
     16 Indeed, in Eigen we have implemented a set of highly optimized routines which are very similar
     17 to BLAS's ones. Unlike BLAS, those routines are made available to user via a high level and
     18 natural API. Each of these routines can compute in a single evaluation a wide variety of expressions.
     19 Given an expression, the challenge is then to map it to a minimal set of routines.
     20 As explained latter, this mechanism has some limitations, and knowing them will allow
     21 you to write faster code by making your expressions more Eigen friendly.
     22 
     23 \section GEMM General Matrix-Matrix product (GEMM)
     24 
     25 Let's start with the most common primitive: the matrix product of general dense matrices.
     26 In the BLAS world this corresponds to the GEMM routine. Our equivalent primitive can
     27 perform the following operation:
     28 \f$ C.noalias() += \alpha op1(A) op2(B) \f$
     29 where A, B, and C are column and/or row major matrices (or sub-matrices),
     30 alpha is a scalar value, and op1, op2 can be transpose, adjoint, conjugate, or the identity.
     31 When Eigen detects a matrix product, it analyzes both sides of the product to extract a
     32 unique scalar factor alpha, and for each side, its effective storage order, shape, and conjugation states.
     33 More precisely each side is simplified by iteratively removing trivial expressions such as scalar multiple,
     34 negation and conjugation. Transpose and Block expressions are not evaluated and they only modify the storage order
     35 and shape. All other expressions are immediately evaluated.
     36 For instance, the following expression:
     37 \code m1.noalias() -= s4 * (s1 * m2.adjoint() * (-(s3*m3).conjugate()*s2))  \endcode
     38 is automatically simplified to:
     39 \code m1.noalias() += (s1*s2*conj(s3)*s4) * m2.adjoint() * m3.conjugate() \endcode
     40 which exactly matches our GEMM routine.
     41 
     42 \subsection GEMM_Limitations Limitations
     43 Unfortunately, this simplification mechanism is not perfect yet and not all expressions which could be
     44 handled by a single GEMM-like call are correctly detected.
     45 <table class="manual" style="width:100%">
     46 <tr>
     47 <th>Not optimal expression</th>
     48 <th>Evaluated as</th>
     49 <th>Optimal version (single evaluation)</th>
     50 <th>Comments</th>
     51 </tr>
     52 <tr>
     53 <td>\code
     54 m1 += m2 * m3; \endcode</td>
     55 <td>\code
     56 temp = m2 * m3;
     57 m1 += temp; \endcode</td>
     58 <td>\code
     59 m1.noalias() += m2 * m3; \endcode</td>
     60 <td>Use .noalias() to tell Eigen the result and right-hand-sides do not alias. 
     61     Otherwise the product m2 * m3 is evaluated into a temporary.</td>
     62 </tr>
     63 <tr class="alt">
     64 <td></td>
     65 <td></td>
     66 <td>\code
     67 m1.noalias() += s1 * (m2 * m3); \endcode</td>
     68 <td>This is a special feature of Eigen. Here the product between a scalar
     69     and a matrix product does not evaluate the matrix product but instead it
     70     returns a matrix product expression tracking the scalar scaling factor. <br>
     71     Without this optimization, the matrix product would be evaluated into a
     72     temporary as in the next example.</td>
     73 </tr>
     74 <tr>
     75 <td>\code
     76 m1.noalias() += (m2 * m3).adjoint(); \endcode</td>
     77 <td>\code
     78 temp = m2 * m3;
     79 m1 += temp.adjoint(); \endcode</td>
     80 <td>\code
     81 m1.noalias() += m3.adjoint()
     82               * m2.adjoint(); \endcode</td>
     83 <td>This is because the product expression has the EvalBeforeNesting bit which
     84     enforces the evaluation of the product by the Tranpose expression.</td>
     85 </tr>
     86 <tr class="alt">
     87 <td>\code
     88 m1 = m1 + m2 * m3; \endcode</td>
     89 <td>\code
     90 temp = m2 * m3;
     91 m1 = m1 + temp; \endcode</td>
     92 <td>\code m1.noalias() += m2 * m3; \endcode</td>
     93 <td>Here there is no way to detect at compile time that the two m1 are the same,
     94     and so the matrix product will be immediately evaluated.</td>
     95 </tr>
     96 <tr>
     97 <td>\code
     98 m1.noalias() = m4 + m2 * m3; \endcode</td>
     99 <td>\code
    100 temp = m2 * m3;
    101 m1 = m4 + temp; \endcode</td>
    102 <td>\code
    103 m1 = m4;
    104 m1.noalias() += m2 * m3; \endcode</td>
    105 <td>First of all, here the .noalias() in the first expression is useless because
    106     m2*m3 will be evaluated anyway. However, note how this expression can be rewritten
    107     so that no temporary is required. (tip: for very small fixed size matrix
    108     it is slighlty better to rewrite it like this: m1.noalias() = m2 * m3; m1 += m4;</td>
    109 </tr>
    110 <tr class="alt">
    111 <td>\code
    112 m1.noalias() += (s1*m2).block(..) * m3; \endcode</td>
    113 <td>\code
    114 temp = (s1*m2).block(..);
    115 m1 += temp * m3; \endcode</td>
    116 <td>\code
    117 m1.noalias() += s1 * m2.block(..) * m3; \endcode</td>
    118 <td>This is because our expression analyzer is currently not able to extract trivial
    119     expressions nested in a Block expression. Therefore the nested scalar
    120     multiple cannot be properly extracted.</td>
    121 </tr>
    122 </table>
    123 
    124 Of course all these remarks hold for all other kind of products involving triangular or selfadjoint matrices.
    125 
    126 */
    127 
    128 }
    129