| /external/valgrind/main/memcheck/tests/ |
| pointer-trace.stderr.exp | 1 1,000 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| static_malloc.stderr.exp | 1 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| trivialleak.stderr.exp | 1 1,000 bytes in 1,000 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| leak-delta.stderr.exp | 2 10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
9 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
14 21 (+21) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
20 65 (+65) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
27 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
33 0 (-10) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
38 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
44 0 (-10) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
49 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
55 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ..
[all...] |
| leak-cases-full.stderr.exp | 5 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record ... of ...
11 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record ... of ...
17 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record ... of ...
23 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record ... of ...
29 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record ... of ...
35 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record ... of ...
41 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
47 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
53 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| leak-cases-possible.stderr.exp | 5 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
11 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
17 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| leak-tree.stderr.exp | 5 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
11 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| leak-cycle.stderr.exp | 5 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
11 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
17 96 (16 direct, 80 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
23 96 (16 direct, 80 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| lks.stderr.exp | 21 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ...
27 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ...
33 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
39 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
45 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| mempool.stderr.exp | 35 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
40 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
45 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
50 48 (32 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| leak-segv-jmp.stderr.exp | 15 1,000 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
31 1,000 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
47 1,000 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
|
| /external/valgrind/main/gdbserver_tests/ |
| mcleak.stderrB.exp | 3 10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
8 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
13 21 (+21) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
18 65 (+65) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
23 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
28 0 (-10) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
33 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
38 0 (-10) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
43 10 (+10) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
48 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ..
[all...] |
| mcleak.stderr.exp | 5 10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
23 10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
28 21 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
33 32 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
38 33 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
|
| mcblocklistsearch.stderrB.exp | 15 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
20 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
25 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
30 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ...
35 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ...
40 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
45 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
51 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
58 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
64 0x........[16] indirect loss record
[all...] |
| /external/chromium_org/third_party/webrtc/modules/bitrate_controller/ |
| send_side_bandwidth_estimation.cc | 26 uint32_t CalcTfrcBps(uint16_t rtt, uint8_t loss) {
27 if (rtt == 0 || loss == 0) {
36 double p = static_cast<double>(loss) / 255; // Packet loss rate in [0, 1).
82 uint8_t* loss,
85 *loss = last_fraction_loss_;
101 // Check sequence number diff and weight loss report
109 // Report loss if the total report is based on sufficiently many packets.
132 // Loss < 2%: Increase rate by 8% of the min bitrate in the last
138 // whenever a receiver report is received with lower packet loss
[all...] |
| send_side_bandwidth_estimation.h | 27 void CurrentEstimate(uint32_t* bitrate, uint8_t* loss, uint32_t* rtt) const;
|
| /external/ceres-solver/examples/ |
| circle_fit.cc | 23 // SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
68 DEFINE_double(robust_threshold, 0.0, "Robust loss parameter. Set to 0 for "
130 // Configure the loss function.
131 LossFunction* loss = NULL; local
133 loss = new CauchyLoss(FLAGS_robust_threshold);
143 problem.AddResidualBlock(cost, loss, &x, &y, &m);
|
| /frameworks/ml/bordeaux/learning/multiclass_pa/native/ |
| multiclass_pa.cpp | 114 float loss = 1.0 - target_class_score + other_class_score; local
115 if (loss > 0.0) {
121 float rate = loss / twice_norm_square;
125 // VLOG(1) << "loss = " << loss << " rate = " << rate;
133 return loss;
147 float loss = 1.0 - target_class_score + other_class_score; local
148 if (loss > 0.0) {
154 float rate = loss / twice_norm_square;
158 // VLOG(1) << "loss = " << loss << " rate = " << rate
[all...] |
| /frameworks/ml/bordeaux/learning/stochastic_linear_ranker/native/ |
| stochastic_linear_ranker.cpp | 37 const double loss = std::max(0.0, (1 - positive_score + negative_score)); local
45 std::min(lambda_, loss / (gradient_norm * gradient_norm));
48 loss / (gradient_norm * gradient_norm + 1 / (2 * lambda_));
101 ALOGE("Unknown rank loss type: %d", rank_loss_type_);
|
| /external/ceres-solver/internal/ceres/ |
| loss_function_test.cc | 23 // SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
47 void AssertLossFunctionIsValid(const LossFunction& loss, double s) {
52 loss.Evaluate(s, rho);
61 loss.Evaluate(s + kH, fwd);
62 loss.Evaluate(s - kH, bwd);
78 // Note that for the Huber loss the test exercises both code paths
125 // Check that loss before and after the approximation threshold are good.
151 // Wrap a few loss functions, and a few scale factors. This can't combine
|
| /external/chromium_org/third_party/webrtc/modules/rtp_rtcp/test/testFec/ |
| test_packet_masks_metrics.cc | 15 * The metrics measure the efficiency (recovery potential or residual loss) of
16 * the FEC code, under various statistical loss models for the packet/symbol
17 * loss events. Various constraints on the behavior of these metrics are
25 * In the case of XOR, the residual loss is determined via the set of packet
26 * masks (generator matrix). In the case of RS, the residual loss is determined
40 * The type of packet/symbol loss models considered in this test are:
41 * (1) Random loss: Bernoulli process, characterized by the average loss rate.
42 * (2) Bursty loss: Markov chain (Gilbert-Elliot model), characterized by two
43 * parameters: average loss rate and average burst length
[all...] |
| /external/chromium_org/media/tools/constrained_network_server/ |
| cns.py | 195 def ServeConstrained(self, f=None, bandwidth=None, latency=None, loss=None,
208 loss: percentage of packets to drop (integer, 0-100).
226 if bandwidth is None and latency is None and loss is None:
230 f, bandwidth=bandwidth, latency=latency, loss=loss, new_port=new_port,
234 # parameters except the network constraints (bandwidth, latency, and loss).
296 def _GetConstrainedPort(self, f=None, bandwidth=None, latency=None, loss=None,
307 loss = self._ParseIntParameter(
308 loss, 'Invalid loss constraint.', lambda x: x <= 100 and x >= 0
[all...] |
| cn.py | 11 The configuration includes bandwidth, latency, and packet loss.
73 parser.add_option('--loss', type='int',
74 help='Packet-loss percentage on outgoing packets. ')
100 'loss': options.loss
|
| /external/chromium_org/third_party/webrtc/modules/remote_bitrate_estimator/ |
| remote_bitrate_estimators_test.cc | 94 LossFilter loss(this);
95 loss.SetLoss(20.0);
100 LossFilter loss(this);
102 loss.SetLoss(i);
|
| /external/iproute2/tc/ |
| q_netem.c | 38 " [ loss random PERCENT [CORRELATION]]\n" \
39 " [ loss state P13 [P31 [P32 [P23 P14]]]\n" \
40 " [ loss gemodel PERCENT [R [1-H [1-K]]]\n" \
221 } else if (matches(*argv, "loss") == 0 ||
223 if (opt.loss > 0 || loss_type != NETEM_LOSS_UNSPEC) {
224 explain1("duplicate loss argument\n");
229 /* Old (deprecated) random loss model syntax */
236 if (get_percent(&opt.loss, *argv)) {
237 explain1("loss percent");
244 explain1("loss correllation")
[all...] |
