1 # 2007 Dec 4 2 # 3 # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of 4 # a legal notice, here is a blessing: 5 # 6 # May you do good and not evil. 7 # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. 8 # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. 9 # 10 #*********************************************************************** 11 # 12 # This file is to test that the issues surrounding expressions in 13 # ORDER BY clauses on compound SELECT statements raised by ticket 14 # #2822 have been dealt with. 15 # 16 # $Id: tkt2822.test,v 1.6 2008/08/20 16:35:10 drh Exp $ 17 # 18 19 set testdir [file dirname $argv0] 20 source $testdir/tester.tcl 21 22 ifcapable !compound { 23 finish_test 24 return 25 } 26 27 # The ORDER BY matching algorithm is three steps: 28 # 29 # (1) If the ORDER BY term is an integer constant i, then 30 # sort by the i-th column of the result set. 31 # 32 # (2) If the ORDER BY term is an identifier (not x.y or x.y.z 33 # but simply x) then look for a column alias with the same 34 # name. If found, then sort by that column. 35 # 36 # (3) Evaluate the term as an expression and sort by the 37 # value of the expression. 38 # 39 # For a compound SELECT the rules are modified slightly. 40 # In the third rule, the expression must exactly match one 41 # of the result columns. The sequences of three rules is 42 # attempted first on the left-most SELECT. If that doesn't 43 # work, we move to the right, one by one. 44 # 45 # Rule (3) is not in standard SQL - it is an SQLite extension, 46 # though one copied from PostgreSQL. The rule for compound 47 # queries where a search is made of SELECTs to the right 48 # if the left-most SELECT does not match is not a part of 49 # standard SQL either. This extension is unique to SQLite 50 # as far as we know. 51 # 52 # Rule (2) was added by the changes ticket #2822. Prior to 53 # that changes, SQLite did not support rule (2), making it 54 # technically in violation of standard SQL semantics. 55 # No body noticed because rule (3) has the same effect as 56 # rule (2) except in some obscure cases. 57 # 58 59 60 # Test plan: 61 # 62 # tkt2822-1.* - Simple identifier as ORDER BY expression. 63 # tkt2822-2.* - More complex ORDER BY expressions. 64 65 do_test tkt2822-0.1 { 66 execsql { 67 CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c); 68 CREATE TABLE t2(a, b, c); 69 70 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 3, 9); 71 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 9, 27); 72 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 15, 45); 73 74 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 6, 18); 75 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 12, 36); 76 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(6, 18, 54); 77 } 78 } {} 79 80 # Test the "ORDER BY <integer>" syntax. 81 # 82 do_test tkt2822-1.1 { 83 execsql { 84 SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY 1; 85 } 86 } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} 87 do_test tkt2822-1.2 { 88 execsql { 89 SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT), c FROM t1 90 UNION ALL 91 SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 92 ORDER BY 2; 93 } 94 } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} 95 96 # Test the "ORDER BY <identifier>" syntax. 97 # 98 do_test tkt2822-2.1 { 99 execsql { 100 SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY a; 101 } 102 } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} 103 104 do_test tkt2822-2.2 { 105 execsql { 106 SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS x, c FROM t1 107 UNION ALL 108 SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 109 ORDER BY x; 110 } 111 } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} 112 do_test tkt2822-2.3 { 113 execsql { 114 SELECT t1.a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY a; 115 } 116 } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} 117 118 # Test the "ORDER BY <expression>" syntax. 119 # 120 do_test tkt2822-3.1 { 121 execsql { 122 SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS x, c FROM t1 123 UNION ALL 124 SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 125 ORDER BY CAST (b AS TEXT); 126 } 127 } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} 128 do_test tkt2822-3.2 { 129 execsql { 130 SELECT t1.a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY t1.a; 131 } 132 } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} 133 134 # Test that if a match cannot be found in the leftmost SELECT, an 135 # attempt is made to find a match in subsequent SELECT statements. 136 # 137 do_test tkt2822-3.3 { 138 execsql { 139 SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a AS x, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY x; 140 } 141 } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} 142 do_test tkt2822-3.4 { 143 # But the leftmost SELECT takes precedence. 144 execsql { 145 SELECT a AS b, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS a, c FROM t1 146 UNION ALL 147 SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 148 ORDER BY a; 149 } 150 } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} 151 do_test tkt2822-3.5 { 152 execsql { 153 SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 154 UNION ALL 155 SELECT a AS b, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS a, c FROM t1 156 ORDER BY a; 157 } 158 } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} 159 160 # Test some error conditions (ORDER BY clauses that match no column). 161 # 162 do_test tkt2822-4.1 { 163 catchsql { 164 SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY x 165 } 166 } {1 {1st ORDER BY term does not match any column in the result set}} 167 do_test tkt2822-4.2 { 168 catchsql { 169 SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS x, c FROM t1 170 UNION ALL 171 SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 172 ORDER BY CAST (b AS INTEGER); 173 } 174 } {1 {1st ORDER BY term does not match any column in the result set}} 175 176 # Tests for rule (2). 177 # 178 # The "ORDER BY b" should match the column alias (rule 2), not the 179 # the t3.b value (rule 3). 180 # 181 do_test tkt2822-5.1 { 182 execsql { 183 CREATE TABLE t3(a,b); 184 INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,8); 185 INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(9,2); 186 187 SELECT a AS b FROM t3 ORDER BY b; 188 } 189 } {1 9} 190 do_test tkt2822-5.2 { 191 # Case does not matter. b should match B 192 execsql { 193 SELECT a AS b FROM t3 ORDER BY B; 194 } 195 } {1 9} 196 do_test tkt2822-5.3 { 197 # Quoting should not matter 198 execsql { 199 SELECT a AS 'b' FROM t3 ORDER BY "B"; 200 } 201 } {1 9} 202 do_test tkt2822-5.4 { 203 # Quoting should not matter 204 execsql { 205 SELECT a AS "b" FROM t3 ORDER BY [B]; 206 } 207 } {1 9} 208 209 # In "ORDER BY +b" the term is now an expression rather than 210 # a label. It therefore matches by rule (3) instead of rule (2). 211 # 212 do_test tkt2822-5.5 { 213 execsql { 214 SELECT a AS b FROM t3 ORDER BY +b; 215 } 216 } {9 1} 217 218 # Tests for rule 2 in compound queries 219 # 220 do_test tkt2822-6.1 { 221 execsql { 222 CREATE TABLE t6a(p,q); 223 INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(1,8); 224 INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(9,2); 225 CREATE TABLE t6b(x,y); 226 INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(1,7); 227 INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(7,2); 228 229 SELECT p, q FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x, y FROM t6b ORDER BY 1, 2 230 } 231 } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} 232 do_test tkt2822-6.2 { 233 execsql { 234 SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b 235 ORDER BY PX, YX 236 } 237 } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} 238 do_test tkt2822-6.3 { 239 execsql { 240 SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b 241 ORDER BY XX, QX 242 } 243 } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} 244 do_test tkt2822-6.4 { 245 execsql { 246 SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b 247 ORDER BY QX, XX 248 } 249 } {7 2 9 2 1 7 1 8} 250 do_test tkt2822-6.5 { 251 execsql { 252 SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b 253 ORDER BY t6b.x, QX 254 } 255 } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} 256 do_test tkt2822-6.6 { 257 execsql { 258 SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b 259 ORDER BY t6a.q, XX 260 } 261 } {7 2 9 2 1 7 1 8} 262 263 # More error message tests. This is really more of a test of the 264 # %r ordinal value formatting capablity added to sqlite3_snprintf() 265 # by ticket #2822. 266 # 267 do_test tkt2822-7.1 { 268 execsql { 269 CREATE TABLE t7(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6,a7,a8,a9,a10,a11,a12,a13,a14, 270 a15,a16,a17,a18,a19,a20,a21,a22,a23,a24,a25); 271 } 272 catchsql { 273 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 0; 274 } 275 } {1 {1st ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 276 do_test tkt2822-7.2 { 277 catchsql { 278 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 0; 279 } 280 } {1 {2nd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 281 do_test tkt2822-7.3 { 282 catchsql { 283 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 0; 284 } 285 } {1 {3rd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 286 do_test tkt2822-7.4 { 287 catchsql { 288 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 0; 289 } 290 } {1 {4th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 291 do_test tkt2822-7.9 { 292 catchsql { 293 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 0; 294 } 295 } {1 {9th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 296 do_test tkt2822-7.10 { 297 catchsql { 298 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0; 299 } 300 } {1 {10th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 301 do_test tkt2822-7.11 { 302 catchsql { 303 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 0; 304 } 305 } {1 {11th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 306 do_test tkt2822-7.12 { 307 catchsql { 308 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 0; 309 } 310 } {1 {12th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 311 do_test tkt2822-7.13 { 312 catchsql { 313 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 0; 314 } 315 } {1 {13th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 316 do_test tkt2822-7.20 { 317 catchsql { 318 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 319 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 0 320 } 321 } {1 {20th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 322 do_test tkt2822-7.21 { 323 catchsql { 324 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 325 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20, 0 326 } 327 } {1 {21st ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 328 do_test tkt2822-7.22 { 329 catchsql { 330 SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 331 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20, 21, 0 332 } 333 } {1 {22nd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} 334 335 336 finish_test 337