Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in X86
      1 ; RUN: llc -march=x86 -o - < %s | FileCheck %s
      2 
      3 ; This used to be classified as a tail call because of a mismatch in the
      4 ; arguments seen by Analysis.cpp and ISelLowering. As seen by ISelLowering, they
      5 ; both return {i32, i32, i32} (since i64 is illegal) which is fine for a tail
      6 ; call.
      7 
      8 ; As seen by Analysis.cpp: i64 -> i32 is a valid trunc, second i32 passes
      9 ; straight through and the third is undef, also OK for a tail call.
     10 
     11 ; Analysis.cpp was wrong.
     12 
     13 ; FIXME: in principle we *could* support some tail calls involving truncations
     14 ; of illegal types: a single "trunc i64 %whatever to i32" is probably valid
     15 ; because of how the extra registers are laid out.
     16 
     17 declare {i64, i32} @test()
     18 
     19 define {i32, i32, i32} @test_pair_notail(i64 %in) {
     20 ; CHECK-LABEL: test_pair_notail
     21 ; CHECK-NOT: jmp
     22 
     23   %whole = tail call {i64, i32} @test()
     24   %first = extractvalue {i64, i32} %whole, 0
     25   %first.trunc = trunc i64 %first to i32
     26 
     27   %second = extractvalue {i64, i32} %whole, 1
     28 
     29   %tmp = insertvalue {i32, i32, i32} undef, i32 %first.trunc, 0
     30   %res = insertvalue {i32, i32, i32} %tmp, i32 %second, 1
     31   ret {i32, i32, i32} %res
     32 }
     33