Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in html
      1 <html>
      2 <head>
      3 <title>pcre2perform specification</title>
      4 </head>
      5 <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#00005A" link="#0066FF" alink="#3399FF" vlink="#2222BB">
      6 <h1>pcre2perform man page</h1>
      7 <p>
      8 Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE2 index page</a>.
      9 </p>
     10 <p>
     11 This page is part of the PCRE2 HTML documentation. It was generated
     12 automatically from the original man page. If there is any nonsense in it,
     13 please consult the man page, in case the conversion went wrong.
     14 <br>
     15 <ul>
     16 <li><a name="TOC1" href="#SEC1">PCRE2 PERFORMANCE</a>
     17 <li><a name="TOC2" href="#SEC2">COMPILED PATTERN MEMORY USAGE</a>
     18 <li><a name="TOC3" href="#SEC3">STACK USAGE AT RUN TIME</a>
     19 <li><a name="TOC4" href="#SEC4">PROCESSING TIME</a>
     20 <li><a name="TOC5" href="#SEC5">AUTHOR</a>
     21 <li><a name="TOC6" href="#SEC6">REVISION</a>
     22 </ul>
     23 <br><a name="SEC1" href="#TOC1">PCRE2 PERFORMANCE</a><br>
     24 <P>
     25 Two aspects of performance are discussed below: memory usage and processing
     26 time. The way you express your pattern as a regular expression can affect both
     27 of them.
     28 </P>
     29 <br><a name="SEC2" href="#TOC1">COMPILED PATTERN MEMORY USAGE</a><br>
     30 <P>
     31 Patterns are compiled by PCRE2 into a reasonably efficient interpretive code,
     32 so that most simple patterns do not use much memory. However, there is one case
     33 where the memory usage of a compiled pattern can be unexpectedly large. If a
     34 parenthesized subpattern has a quantifier with a minimum greater than 1 and/or
     35 a limited maximum, the whole subpattern is repeated in the compiled code. For
     36 example, the pattern
     37 <pre>
     38   (abc|def){2,4}
     39 </pre>
     40 is compiled as if it were
     41 <pre>
     42   (abc|def)(abc|def)((abc|def)(abc|def)?)?
     43 </pre>
     44 (Technical aside: It is done this way so that backtrack points within each of
     45 the repetitions can be independently maintained.)
     46 </P>
     47 <P>
     48 For regular expressions whose quantifiers use only small numbers, this is not
     49 usually a problem. However, if the numbers are large, and particularly if such
     50 repetitions are nested, the memory usage can become an embarrassment. For
     51 example, the very simple pattern
     52 <pre>
     53   ((ab){1,1000}c){1,3}
     54 </pre>
     55 uses 51K bytes when compiled using the 8-bit library. When PCRE2 is compiled
     56 with its default internal pointer size of two bytes, the size limit on a
     57 compiled pattern is 64K code units in the 8-bit and 16-bit libraries, and this
     58 is reached with the above pattern if the outer repetition is increased from 3
     59 to 4. PCRE2 can be compiled to use larger internal pointers and thus handle
     60 larger compiled patterns, but it is better to try to rewrite your pattern to
     61 use less memory if you can.
     62 </P>
     63 <P>
     64 One way of reducing the memory usage for such patterns is to make use of
     65 PCRE2's
     66 <a href="pcre2pattern.html#subpatternsassubroutines">"subroutine"</a>
     67 facility. Re-writing the above pattern as
     68 <pre>
     69   ((ab)(?2){0,999}c)(?1){0,2}
     70 </pre>
     71 reduces the memory requirements to 18K, and indeed it remains under 20K even
     72 with the outer repetition increased to 100. However, this pattern is not
     73 exactly equivalent, because the "subroutine" calls are treated as
     74 <a href="pcre2pattern.html#atomicgroup">atomic groups</a>
     75 into which there can be no backtracking if there is a subsequent matching
     76 failure. Therefore, PCRE2 cannot do this kind of rewriting automatically.
     77 Furthermore, there is a noticeable loss of speed when executing the modified
     78 pattern. Nevertheless, if the atomic grouping is not a problem and the loss of
     79 speed is acceptable, this kind of rewriting will allow you to process patterns
     80 that PCRE2 cannot otherwise handle.
     81 </P>
     82 <br><a name="SEC3" href="#TOC1">STACK USAGE AT RUN TIME</a><br>
     83 <P>
     84 When <b>pcre2_match()</b> is used for matching, certain kinds of pattern can
     85 cause it to use large amounts of the process stack. In some environments the
     86 default process stack is quite small, and if it runs out the result is often
     87 SIGSEGV. Rewriting your pattern can often help. The
     88 <a href="pcre2stack.html"><b>pcre2stack</b></a>
     89 documentation discusses this issue in detail.
     90 </P>
     91 <br><a name="SEC4" href="#TOC1">PROCESSING TIME</a><br>
     92 <P>
     93 Certain items in regular expression patterns are processed more efficiently
     94 than others. It is more efficient to use a character class like [aeiou] than a
     95 set of single-character alternatives such as (a|e|i|o|u). In general, the
     96 simplest construction that provides the required behaviour is usually the most
     97 efficient. Jeffrey Friedl's book contains a lot of useful general discussion
     98 about optimizing regular expressions for efficient performance. This document
     99 contains a few observations about PCRE2.
    100 </P>
    101 <P>
    102 Using Unicode character properties (the \p, \P, and \X escapes) is slow,
    103 because PCRE2 has to use a multi-stage table lookup whenever it needs a
    104 character's property. If you can find an alternative pattern that does not use
    105 character properties, it will probably be faster.
    106 </P>
    107 <P>
    108 By default, the escape sequences \b, \d, \s, and \w, and the POSIX
    109 character classes such as [:alpha:] do not use Unicode properties, partly for
    110 backwards compatibility, and partly for performance reasons. However, you can
    111 set the PCRE2_UCP option or start the pattern with (*UCP) if you want Unicode
    112 character properties to be used. This can double the matching time for items
    113 such as \d, when matched with <b>pcre2_match()</b>; the performance loss is
    114 less with a DFA matching function, and in both cases there is not much
    115 difference for \b.
    116 </P>
    117 <P>
    118 When a pattern begins with .* not in atomic parentheses, nor in parentheses
    119 that are the subject of a backreference, and the PCRE2_DOTALL option is set,
    120 the pattern is implicitly anchored by PCRE2, since it can match only at the
    121 start of a subject string. If the pattern has multiple top-level branches, they
    122 must all be anchorable. The optimization can be disabled by the
    123 PCRE2_NO_DOTSTAR_ANCHOR option, and is automatically disabled if the pattern
    124 contains (*PRUNE) or (*SKIP).
    125 </P>
    126 <P>
    127 If PCRE2_DOTALL is not set, PCRE2 cannot make this optimization, because the
    128 dot metacharacter does not then match a newline, and if the subject string
    129 contains newlines, the pattern may match from the character immediately
    130 following one of them instead of from the very start. For example, the pattern
    131 <pre>
    132   .*second
    133 </pre>
    134 matches the subject "first\nand second" (where \n stands for a newline
    135 character), with the match starting at the seventh character. In order to do
    136 this, PCRE2 has to retry the match starting after every newline in the subject.
    137 </P>
    138 <P>
    139 If you are using such a pattern with subject strings that do not contain
    140 newlines, the best performance is obtained by setting PCRE2_DOTALL, or starting
    141 the pattern with ^.* or ^.*? to indicate explicit anchoring. That saves PCRE2
    142 from having to scan along the subject looking for a newline to restart at.
    143 </P>
    144 <P>
    145 Beware of patterns that contain nested indefinite repeats. These can take a
    146 long time to run when applied to a string that does not match. Consider the
    147 pattern fragment
    148 <pre>
    149   ^(a+)*
    150 </pre>
    151 This can match "aaaa" in 16 different ways, and this number increases very
    152 rapidly as the string gets longer. (The * repeat can match 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4
    153 times, and for each of those cases other than 0 or 4, the + repeats can match
    154 different numbers of times.) When the remainder of the pattern is such that the
    155 entire match is going to fail, PCRE2 has in principle to try every possible
    156 variation, and this can take an extremely long time, even for relatively short
    157 strings.
    158 </P>
    159 <P>
    160 An optimization catches some of the more simple cases such as
    161 <pre>
    162   (a+)*b
    163 </pre>
    164 where a literal character follows. Before embarking on the standard matching
    165 procedure, PCRE2 checks that there is a "b" later in the subject string, and if
    166 there is not, it fails the match immediately. However, when there is no
    167 following literal this optimization cannot be used. You can see the difference
    168 by comparing the behaviour of
    169 <pre>
    170   (a+)*\d
    171 </pre>
    172 with the pattern above. The former gives a failure almost instantly when
    173 applied to a whole line of "a" characters, whereas the latter takes an
    174 appreciable time with strings longer than about 20 characters.
    175 </P>
    176 <P>
    177 In many cases, the solution to this kind of performance issue is to use an
    178 atomic group or a possessive quantifier.
    179 </P>
    180 <br><a name="SEC5" href="#TOC1">AUTHOR</a><br>
    181 <P>
    182 Philip Hazel
    183 <br>
    184 University Computing Service
    185 <br>
    186 Cambridge, England.
    187 <br>
    188 </P>
    189 <br><a name="SEC6" href="#TOC1">REVISION</a><br>
    190 <P>
    191 Last updated: 02 January 2015
    192 <br>
    193 Copyright &copy; 1997-2015 University of Cambridge.
    194 <br>
    195 <p>
    196 Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE2 index page</a>.
    197 </p>
    198