Home | History | Annotate | Download | only in docs
      1 =============================
      2 Code Reviews with Phabricator
      3 =============================
      4 
      5 .. contents::
      6   :local:
      7 
      8 If you prefer to use a web user interface for code reviews, you can now submit
      9 your patches for Clang and LLVM at `LLVM's Phabricator`_ instance.
     10 
     11 While Phabricator is a useful tool for some, the relevant -commits mailing list
     12 is the system of record for all LLVM code review. The mailing list should be
     13 added as a subscriber on all reviews, and Phabricator users should be prepared
     14 to respond to free-form comments in mail sent to the commits list.
     15 
     16 Sign up
     17 -------
     18 
     19 To get started with Phabricator, navigate to `http://reviews.llvm.org`_ and
     20 click the power icon in the top right. You can register with a GitHub account,
     21 a Google account, or you can create your own profile.
     22 
     23 Make *sure* that the email address registered with Phabricator is subscribed
     24 to the relevant -commits mailing list. If you are not subscribed to the commit
     25 list, all mail sent by Phabricator on your behalf will be held for moderation.
     26 
     27 Note that if you use your Subversion user name as Phabricator user name,
     28 Phabricator will automatically connect your submits to your Phabricator user in
     29 the `Code Repository Browser`_.
     30 
     31 Requesting a review via the command line
     32 ----------------------------------------
     33 
     34 Phabricator has a tool called *Arcanist* to upload patches from
     35 the command line. To get you set up, follow the
     36 `Arcanist Quick Start`_ instructions.
     37 
     38 You can learn more about how to use arc to interact with
     39 Phabricator in the `Arcanist User Guide`_.
     40 
     41 Requesting a review via the web interface
     42 -----------------------------------------
     43 
     44 The tool to create and review patches in Phabricator is called
     45 *Differential*.
     46 
     47 Note that you can upload patches created through various diff tools,
     48 including git and svn. To make reviews easier, please always include
     49 **as much context as possible** with your diff! Don't worry, Phabricator
     50 will automatically send a diff with a smaller context in the review
     51 email, but having the full file in the web interface will help the
     52 reviewer understand your code.
     53 
     54 To get a full diff, use one of the following commands (or just use Arcanist
     55 to upload your patch):
     56 
     57 * ``git diff -U999999 other-branch``
     58 * ``svn diff --diff-cmd=diff -x -U999999``
     59 
     60 To upload a new patch:
     61 
     62 * Click *Differential*.
     63 * Click *+ Create Diff*.
     64 * Paste the text diff or browse to the patch file. Click *Create Diff*.
     65 * Leave the Repository field blank.
     66 * Leave the drop down on *Create a new Revision...* and click *Continue*.
     67 * Enter a descriptive title and summary.  The title and summary are usually
     68   in the form of a :ref:`commit message <commit messages>`.
     69 * Add reviewers (see below for advice) and subscribe mailing
     70   lists that you want to be included in the review. If your patch is
     71   for LLVM, add llvm-commits as a Subscriber; if your patch is for Clang,
     72   add cfe-commits.
     73 * Leave the Repository and Project fields blank.
     74 * Click *Save*.
     75 
     76 To submit an updated patch:
     77 
     78 * Click *Differential*.
     79 * Click *+ Create Diff*.
     80 * Paste the updated diff or browse to the updated patch file. Click *Create Diff*.
     81 * Select the review you want to from the *Attach To* dropdown and click
     82   *Continue*.
     83 * Leave the Repository and Project fields blank.
     84 * Add comments about the changes in the new diff. Click *Save*.
     85 
     86 Choosing reviewers: You typically pick one or two people as initial reviewers.
     87 This choice is not crucial, because you are merely suggesting and not requiring
     88 them to participate. Many people will see the email notification on cfe-commits
     89 or llvm-commits, and if the subject line suggests the patch is something they
     90 should look at, they will.
     91 
     92 Here are a couple of ways to pick the initial reviewer(s):
     93 
     94 * Use ``svn blame`` and the commit log to find names of people who have
     95   recently modified the same area of code that you are modifying.
     96 * Look in CODE_OWNERS.TXT to see who might be responsible for that area.
     97 * If you've discussed the change on a dev list, the people who participated
     98   might be appropriate reviewers.
     99 
    100 Even if you think the code owner is the busiest person in the world, it's still
    101 okay to put them as a reviewer. Being the code owner means they have accepted
    102 responsibility for making sure the review happens.
    103 
    104 Reviewing code with Phabricator
    105 -------------------------------
    106 
    107 Phabricator allows you to add inline comments as well as overall comments
    108 to a revision. To add an inline comment, select the lines of code you want
    109 to comment on by clicking and dragging the line numbers in the diff pane.
    110 When you have added all your comments, scroll to the bottom of the page and
    111 click the Submit button.
    112 
    113 You can add overall comments in the text box at the bottom of the page.
    114 When you're done, click the Submit button.
    115 
    116 Phabricator has many useful features, for example allowing you to select
    117 diffs between different versions of the patch as it was reviewed in the
    118 *Revision Update History*. Most features are self descriptive - explore, and
    119 if you have a question, drop by on #llvm in IRC to get help.
    120 
    121 Note that as e-mail is the system of reference for code reviews, and some
    122 people prefer it over a web interface, we do not generate automated mail
    123 when a review changes state, for example by clicking "Accept Revision" in
    124 the web interface. Thus, please type LGTM into the comment box to accept
    125 a change from Phabricator.
    126 
    127 Committing a change
    128 -------------------
    129 
    130 Once a patch has been reviewed and approved on Phabricator it can then be
    131 committed to trunk.  There are multiple workflows to achieve this. Whichever
    132 method you follow it is recommend that your commit message ends with the line:
    133 
    134 ::
    135 
    136   Differential Revision: <URL>
    137 
    138 where ``<URL>`` is the URL for the code review, starting with
    139 ``http://reviews.llvm.org/``.
    140 
    141 This allows people reading the version history to see the review for
    142 context. This also allows Phabricator to detect the commit, close the
    143 review, and add a link from the review to the commit.
    144 
    145 Note that if you use the Arcanist tool the ``Differential Revision`` line will
    146 be added automatically. If you don't want to use Arcanist, you can add the
    147 ``Differential Revision`` line (as the last line) to the commit message
    148 yourself.
    149 
    150 Using the Arcanist tool can simplify the process of committing reviewed code
    151 as it will retrieve reviewers, the ``Differential Revision``, etc from the review
    152 and place it in the commit message. Several methods of using Arcanist to commit
    153 code are given below. If you do not wish to use Arcanist then simply commit
    154 the reviewed patch as you would normally.
    155 
    156 Note that if you commit the change without using Arcanist and forget to add the
    157 ``Differential Revision`` line to your commit message then it is recommended
    158 that you close the review manually. In the web UI, under "Leap Into Action" put
    159 the SVN revision number in the Comment, set the Action to "Close Revision" and
    160 click Submit.  Note the review must have been Accepted first.
    161 
    162 Subversion and Arcanist
    163 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    164 
    165 On a clean Subversion working copy run the following (where ``<Revision>`` is
    166 the Phabricator review number):
    167 
    168 ::
    169 
    170   arc patch D<Revision>
    171   arc commit --revision D<Revision>
    172 
    173 The first command will take the latest version of the reviewed patch and apply it to the working
    174 copy. The second command will commit this revision to trunk.
    175 
    176 git-svn and Arcanist
    177 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    178 
    179 This presumes that the git repository has been configured as described in :ref:`developers-work-with-git-svn`.
    180 
    181 On a clean Git repository on an up to date ``master`` branch run the
    182 following (where ``<Revision>`` is the Phabricator review number):
    183 
    184 ::
    185 
    186   arc patch D<Revision>
    187 
    188 
    189 This will create a new branch called ``arcpatch-D<Revision>`` based on the
    190 current ``master`` and will create a commit corresponding to ``D<Revision>`` with a
    191 commit message derived from information in the Phabricator review.
    192 
    193 Check you are happy with the commit message and amend it if necessary. Now switch to
    194 the ``master`` branch and add the new commit to it and commit it to trunk. This
    195 can be done by running the following:
    196 
    197 ::
    198 
    199   git checkout master
    200   git merge --ff-only arcpatch-D<Revision>
    201   git svn dcommit
    202 
    203 
    204 
    205 Abandoning a change
    206 -------------------
    207 
    208 If you decide you should not commit the patch, you should explicitly abandon
    209 the review so that reviewers don't think it is still open. In the web UI,
    210 scroll to the bottom of the page where normally you would enter an overall
    211 comment. In the drop-down Action list, which defaults to "Comment," you should
    212 select "Abandon Revision" and then enter a comment explaining why. Click the
    213 Submit button to finish closing the review.
    214 
    215 Status
    216 ------
    217 
    218 Please let us know whether you like it and what could be improved! We're still
    219 working on setting up a bug tracker, but you can email klimek-at-google-dot-com
    220 and chandlerc-at-gmail-dot-com and CC the llvm-dev mailing list with questions
    221 until then. We also could use help implementing improvements. This sadly is
    222 really painful and hard because the Phabricator codebase is in PHP and not as
    223 testable as you might like. However, we've put exactly what we're deploying up
    224 on an `llvm-reviews GitHub project`_ where folks can hack on it and post pull
    225 requests. We're looking into what the right long-term hosting for this is, but
    226 note that it is a derivative of an existing open source project, and so not
    227 trivially a good fit for an official LLVM project.
    228 
    229 .. _LLVM's Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org
    230 .. _`http://reviews.llvm.org`: http://reviews.llvm.org
    231 .. _Code Repository Browser: http://reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/
    232 .. _Arcanist Quick Start: https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/arcanist_quick_start/
    233 .. _Arcanist User Guide: https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/arcanist/
    234 .. _llvm-reviews GitHub project: https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews/
    235